February
12, 2007
We’ll
Support a Troop Surge Unless He Does Too
It is no
news that many of our representatives in Congress have long treated the
Iraq War as no more than a political tool. This egocentricity has come
at the cost of emboldened terrorists in Iraq and a less-than-effective
execution of political and military strategies in that country. The
combination of mostly Democratic legislators’ rhetoric and the media’s
anti-war predisposition has over the past few months and years convinced
many Americans that withdrawal from Iraq would indeed be a good idea.
Unfortunately, winning the majority in both the House and the Senate was
not sufficient for Democrats to stop playing politics with soldiers’
lives and, for all intents and purposes, the future of the world. Moving
toward November 2006, Democrats established their campaign theme based
on a close reading of the polls showing general dissatisfaction with the
war (which, incidentally, they had helped to artificially inflate). But
after taking both chambers of Congress, they realized that they had to
stick with their promises of opposing President Bush on Iraq, no matter
what the price is for the country. And, well, they have certainly been
fulfilling that promise.
Criticizing
the administration’s handling of the war had always been a pleasant,
open-ended task. Since they promised to oppose the status quo (though
without specifying any alternative to it during campaign season),
Democrats could do so in a variety of ways. They could put all the blame
on Donald Rumsfeld, suggest that the rest of the world isn’t approving
of our conduct, propose that we immediately withdraw our troops,
reiterate that “Bush lied, children died” or even somehow tie it all in
with global warming.
But a large
number of Democrats had for years, and until very recently, thought that
a humiliating retreat would not look so good for their national security
image. “How do we oppose the president on Iraq yet make it sound like we
want to win there,” they asked themselves. The answer was, send more
troops to Iraq!
After his
party gained seats in the November elections, Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid explained that he supported a troop surge in Iraq. Senate
Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joe Biden has also continuously
encouraged a troop increase. Even Senator John Kerry has expressed
support for the idea of sending more dumb Americans to Iraq, saying that
“if it requires more troops in order to create the stability that
eliminates the chaos… that's what we have to do.”
Many
delegates in the House of Representatives shared this view as well.
Notable is Congressman Silvestre Reyes, Chairman of the House
Intelligence Committee. As recently as December, Reyes noted, “we have
to consider the need for additional troops to be in Iraq, to take out
the militias and stabilize Iraq… I would say 20,000 to 30,000.”
But then
the Democrats’ worst nightmare happened: President Bush agreed with
them! In complete accord with these Democratic leaders in Congress, the
administration announced that it will be adding 21,500 troops to the
fight in Iraq. This came as a shock to the Democrats, who fear nothing
more than the appearance of agreeing with Bush, the bashing of whom won
them a congressional majority in November.
Upon
hearing that the administration was planning a troop surge, these
Democrats’ solid positions suddenly changed. Reid and Biden no longer
support the troops surge they had advocated. Kerry became against to the
troop surge after he was for it. Reyes also opposed the move, so
blatantly overlooking the fact that he held the precisely opposite
position only a month before. But we’ll let that one slide, maybe he was
as tired in that interview as he was when he explained that Al-Qaeda was
a predominantly Shiite organization.
They don’t
even try to hide the hypocrisy; perhaps they know the mainstream media
will just overlook it. But how does their conscience handle it? If they
were advocating a troop surge, we’d hope that they were doing so because
they sincerely believed that such action would be the best for America
and the world. The radical change in their position, done for the sole
purpose of opposing the president, should not go unnoticed by the
American people. And if the troop surge does work, the credit should not
go to these Democrats – although they would most certainly credit their
newly acquired majority status for the victory.
Come to
think of it, perhaps Republicans should take advantage of the Democrats’
shameful behavior. We should lobby President Bush to propose higher
taxes, legalization of gay marriage, universal health care and the
immediate withdrawal of our troops from Iraq. Nothing would do a better
job at making Congressional Democrats change their position on these
issues than Bush’s association with them and their left-wing ideals.
To offer
feedback on this column,
click here.
© 2007 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # PI39.
Request permission to publish here.
|