December 7, 2005
Smokers Need Not Apply, Other Problems Welcome
Somewhere in our history, enough Americans with loud voices decided the
best way to keep people from something dangerous is to scare the
bejeezus out of them. Evidently, frightened children have blossomed into
frightened adults in charge of big companies.
On
December 1, The World Health Organization (WHO) stopped hiring smokers.
Corporate Accountability International (CAI), a corporation whose goal
is to “challenge irresponsible and dangerous corporate actions around
the world”, has teamed with the WHO’s campaign, claiming, “The WHO’s
initiative will put pressure on the U.S. Congress to implement effective
tobacco control measures.”
The WHO is not the first company to enact such a policy. In 2003, Weyco
Incorporated, a company specializing in
Employee Benefit Plans and Benefit
Management, announced “smokers need not apply.”
In 2004, Union Pacific followed suit.
The Department of Health and Human Services estimated
that “smokers account for 8% of U.S. healthcare expenditures, or $75
billion, followed by another $80 billion in lost productivity.”
Assuming these figures are
correct, it is hard to blame the companies that offer benefits for being
reluctant to hire smokers. Of course, the next logical step is to steer
clear of the hefty population, as I can only imagine that the healthcare
and productivity figures for obese people are, well, obese. However,
because it is much more popular to vilify smokers than a fat person,
companies will probably avoid explicitly rejecting job applicants on
account of their obesity for quite a while.
Since
potty-training, children are assured that cigarettes were created by
Satan and that anyone who smokes them probably serves him coffee. They
are only allowed to see a cigarette if it is surrounded by a thick red
circle with a diagonal line through it, or between the lips of someone
with dark patches under their eyes and unkempt, musty hair, pictured in
black and white. (Humor yourself and imagine the tobacco in these ads
replaced by profiles of fat people, or double-cheeseburgers.)
It is
responsible to inform children that smokers tend to die sooner, but do
we really need to add, “And by the way, Tommy, your Uncle Larry is a bad
person”? Every time I watch one of those “the truth” commercials, I feel
like America is being invaded by teenage zombies.
So what
if tobacco-users cost more money to maintain and do not work as
efficiently? If the criterion for hiring employees is the same as the
criterion for buying a car, then companies ought to stop hiring anyone
with any condition that typically leads to increased healthcare costs
and decreased productivity. As long as employees require healthcare
benefits and companies are obliging, companies have every right to
stipulate good health.
“Well,
miss, you are the most brilliant and talented software engineer this
company has ever seen, but quite frankly, we are leery of your high
cholesterol. Sorry.”
CAI’s
suggestion that “The U.S. implement effective tobacco control measures”
is the wrong formula. They, along with the WHO, are attempting to
indirectly suffocate an unhealthy habit through the work force. But they
fail to realize that people will never stop smoking. People like tobacco
and it will not go away. They also fail to realize that smokers have as
much right to work as anyone else.
The
core of this issue is greater than some statistics about tobacco-users.
It is about whether or not companies that offer benefits are prepared to
issue rigorous physical evaluations during both the hiring process and
throughout the length of employment. (People are not born with bad
habits, they develop them.) Until these companies are prepared for this
sort of general discrimination, the employment limitations placed on
tobacco-users must be considered bigotry in its purest sense.
© 2005 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # NS3.
Request permission to publish here.
|