October 18,
2006
The Laugh
Track and Its Emotional Comedic Scars
Thanks to
Singing in the Rain, the latter generations of the 20th
century were able to relive what must have been the extraordinary
experience of not only watching, but also hearing, moving figures on a
screen. It must have been a most humbling incident.
But as
usual, the public at large had no idea of the magnitude of what was
coming. Although never immortalized by classic cinema, one can only
imagine the first time some poor sap sat down in his living room to
watch his favorite sitcom, commenced to chuckle, and had the horrifying
experience of being overpowered by the uproarious laughter of one
hundred unfamiliar voices. He must have hurried for his fire stoker and
checked every room, closet, storage container and kitchen cabinet for
intruders, only to be teased and prodded by the continuing bellows that
really did seem to be emanating from the television.
Apparently,
the idea for the laugh track was actually an evolved form of the phrase,
“buhdum- CHHH,” which is still used today. “The Flintstones”’ creators
inserted the phrase after every humorous joke or situation because they
knew that most viewers would never know if or when something was
supposed to be funny. Whether it was the quality of the script-writers
or the viewers themselves they distrusted, creators were certainly onto
something when they figured that something a bit less discrete than the
joke itself would make the experience of watching a sitcom considerably
less tiring.
Next came
the sound of the cymbal, which, everyone agreed, sounded much better.
But before long, someone spoke up and said, “You know, folks. Percussion
has nothing to do with humor. We ought to simply record ourselves
laughing, and trick the audience into thinking there are people
peeking in their living room windows who happen to know exactly when
they’re supposed to laugh.” It was this individual who originally
stumbled upon one of the truest characteristics of humanity during that
particular era. No one, except the people who fund comedic endeavors,
knows whether or not something is truly funny. We may know what seems
funny to us, but how can we ever really know for sure? The truth is,
back then we couldn’t, and that was a problem.
It was
laugh tracks that softened the transition from moving picture comedy
without sound to moving picture comedy with sound. Quite frankly, it was
the laugh track that put television comedy on the map.
With the
emergence of the 21st century, however, television audiences
are beginning to trust themselves. We are transitioning once again.
Shows such as “Malcolm in the Middle” and “Scrubs” have helped
television executives to begin ushering out the era of the laugh track.
However, the latest transition has not descended without substantial
collateral damage. “Arrested Development”, one of the wittiest, edgiest
shows to emerge in the last five years, was canceled due to low
viewership. Apparently, without a laugh track, viewers found themselves
without the familiar assurance of unfamiliar voices that say, “Recline
lazily assured that we think it’s funny too.” All of a sudden people
were watching a show that seemed funny, but in the meantime, they found
themselves alone on their couches, asking aloud, “Am I really the only
one laughing at this?”
No, there
were others. But it is your fault a brilliant comedy fell by the
wayside. Some of us have been more affected than others. The younger
demographic may find itself slightly more prepared to enjoy
laugh-track-free programming, but anyone who claims that their lives as
TV viewers will continue unaffected by the laugh track era are deceiving
themselves. The truth is, for anyone who has ever watched comic gems
like “I Love Lucy”, “Cheers” or any one of a large collection of
shows still broadcast with the infamous laugh track, in the back of our
minds, we will never completely trust ourselves to laugh without risking
non-public embarrassment. Alas, the laugh track era will live on and on,
hand in hand with the scars it caused, until the last of us who sat
alone but laughed in spurious community, finally die out.
© 2006 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # NS26.
Request permission to publish here.
|
|
|