Lucia
de Vernai
Read Lucia's bio and previous columns
July 28, 2008
Obama Rolled By the
Iraqis; Get Used To It, Rock Star
Barack Obama’s international tour confirmed his rock star status,
drawing crowds and media attention wherever he went. The 200,000 people
who showed up in Berlin to hear his clever – although rather predictable
– allusion to the Reagan “Mister Gorbachev, tear down this wall” speech
Berlin were inspired. German Chancellor Angela Merkel called him
“politically and physically fit.”
Yet his time in the Middle East makes one wonder: “He’s pretty . . . but
can he lead?”
When Obama was in Iraq,
the
spokesman for the Iraqi government, Ali al-Dabbagh, said that there is
an Iraqi vision of “a real timetable which Iraqis set, up to the end of
2010.” A clear endorsement for Obama’s 16-month withdrawal plan, it is a
direct contradiction of the assurances by John McCain’s senior foreign
policy adviser Randy Scheunemann, who claims the Republicans received
“personal assurance” from the Iraqi president and prime minister that
they oppose a deadline.
When a German news magazine printed the al-Dabbagh comments, the White
House insisted that the spokesman was misquoted . . . and then al-Dabbagh
retracted part of his statement for good measure. Did Obama get used by
the Iraqis to put pressure on the current administration? It looks like
it, especially since, for the very first time, President Bush mentioned
a “time horizon” to withdraw troops.
Then again, it’s wise to be careful taking the president’s words to
heart, at least when it comes to assessing the situation in the Middle
East. This calls for a “mission accomplished” joke, but maybe we’re on
an entirely new mission now. Prolonged presence in Iraq would save a lot
of time and money if (and by “if” I mean “when”) we decide to show those
cocky Iranians who’s boss.
Sure, about 20,000 of our troops in the region are on anti-depressants
and last year alone almost 1,000 attempted suicide. The important thing
is that violence has gone down. In fact, in the first five months of the
year we lost “only” 179 soldiers. To McCain this is a victory – after
all, previous to last year’s addition of 30,000 troops, the number of
troop losses was almost 500. And the Arizona senator will not let us
forget that Obama opposed the addition of those troops.
All this may start chipping at Obama’s greatest strength – his
enthusiasm and yet-unspoiled faith in enacting change. He’s still shiny
and new, but as Iraqis use him as a political pawn, and long-term
effects of war are haunting troops even after they return home, the
idealism and grand plans make “I want change, progress and peace” sound
a lot like “I want a pony!”
Yes, world peace, Iraqi freedom, troops safe back at home and love,
peace and unity in the Middle East are certainly wanted. But Obama
traveling the world telling the world community how he wants to change
the world will soon not be enough. Unless Obama sacrifices some of his
idealism for a dose of realism, he is not likely to be taken seriously
in the world of international relations.
© 2008 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # LB127.
Request
permission to publish here.
|