January 1,
2007
EU
Expansion: Someone Here Doesn’t Belong
To date, I
have never kept a New Year’s resolution, so I decided that I should
start making them for others. The theme for 2007 is ‘Stop Shooting
Yourself in the Foot,’ and the lucky recipient of my counsel this year
is the European Union.
The member
states have a strange relationship as it is. Less than 25 years ago,
most of them were ready to go to war with one another. Today they smile
and shake hands under a common banner. It’s really quite charming, makes
me tear up.
You know
what else makes me tear up? Human rights violations, lack of medical
care and corruption. So when the EU decided to grant membership to my
native country of Poland, I winced. Our socio-political culture was not,
and is not, ready for the membership. Some economists predict that the
euro cannot be introduced for another 10 years.
Many have
argued that Poland will meet these standards once admitted. It has been
a few years now and while IKEA is doing great business there, the
country is losing its doctor population at 2 percent a year and the
average GDP per capita is 50 percent of an average EU citizen’s.
If that
stinks of inequality to you, please say hello to the two newest
additions to the EU: Romania and Bulgaria. GDP per capita? 33 percent of
the average EU citizen’s. I’m not going to elaborate on the chaotic
bureaucracy and lack of adequate social programs. Point is, they don’t
belong.
The
European Union is meant to be an elite organization that serves as a
model to other countries. It is not an outreach program for economically
and socially disadvantaged nations.
If the
European Union seeks to retain its prestige, it needs to be more
selective when it comes to picking members. Judging from its actions to
date, it is less committed to ideals it allegedly seeks to promote and
is more eastward-expansion-oriented.
By focusing
on quantity, the organization loses on quality. It compromises its
principles when it allows countries that are not ready to share the
responsibility of being a modern European nation as others to join the
Union.
While the
celebrations in Sofia and Bucharest focused on the advantages and
opportunities for the newest member nations, economists and political
analysts are predicting misuse of aid and the need to ban certain food
exports.
The
powerful member states of the EU have a strong interest in opening new
markets. However, opening the door to the organization as a means of
achieving this advantage, while ignoring the shortcomings of potential
members, is unprincipled.
Romania
and Bulgaria were admitted into the Union despite the fact that only 41
percent of EU citizens approve of further expansion. It is likely that
the admission of these Balkan states to the EU is a prelude to Turkey’s
admission. If we keep up the rate we’re going at, the Uzbek flag will be
flying in at the EU headquarters in Brussels.
Whether the
motivation is greed or genuine desire for unity, the EU should stick to
its previous resolutions and uphold all of its standards.
To offer
feedback on this column,
click here.
© 2007 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # LB41.
Request permission to publish here.
|