January 15,
2007
Dangerous
Democrats vs. the Free Market
The
American public is about to once again witness the liberals’ total
disdain for, and ignorance of, the dynamics of capitalism and our free
market economic system. Liberals in the House have already passed
legislation to increase the federal minimum wage three times over the
next two years. They have clearly voiced their economy-killing positions
on issues ranging from tax rate increases to dictating what companies
should pay their employees.
Since
Franklin Roosevelt’s socialist New Deal policies, to Lyndon Johnson’s
budget-busting Great Society, through Carter’s stagflation and Clinton’s
largest tax increase in history, liberal Democrats never fail to cook up
schemes that deny individuals their economic freedom and shackle our
economy. That’s what they do.
The
liberals’ so-called new direction is in fact the same direction they
always go when entrusted with the reins of power – backwards. The first
sight in their targets is, as always, successful businesses and the
specter of a nonexistent national income disparity.
The new
Democratic chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Rep.
Barney Frank (D-MA), wants the federal government to work on reducing
income inequality. He will no doubt conduct numerous hearings and
eventually initiate legislation that starts us down a slippery slope
toward capping executive salaries and compensation. Liberals want us out
of their bedrooms, but cannot wait to get into corporate boardrooms.
The only
obstacles facing liberals are the facts. CNSNews.com reported on January
5 that Frank plans to focus his hearings on: “Why the top income earners
are making so much more than lower earners and what the government can
do about it.” Yet a Census Bureau study commissioned by the Congress’s
own Joint Economic Committee found that from 2001 to 2005 there was
“virtually no statistical change in income inequality.”
Rep. Frank
appeared January 4 on “Your World with Neil Cavuto” to make his case for
increased government oversight of corporate compensation. He argued, “I
think we should let the owners of the companies decide what the CEO pay
should be, and that’s the shareholders.” Earth to Congressman Frank,
they already do! Corporate directors are elected by the shareholders and
represent the shareholders. And in every corporate structure I am aware
of there are corporate governance rules for nominating directors and
changing directors if the shareholders are not happy with their
decisions.
Congressman Frank added, “What
we need to do is step in and amend the law because in some states where
corporate law is set, shareholders who want to have a vote can’t get
one. What I propose is that we should pass a law giving the shareholders
a right to vote on these issues.” Most corporations are not structured
that way, and if you can find some that are then shareholders can take
their money somewhere else. Again, the facts and common sense are not on
his side.
New
statistics from the December 2006 jobs report provide additional facts
that will surely annoy liberals. U.S. employers added 167,000 jobs last
month, and the jobs figures for October and November 2006 were revised
upward by 29,000 jobs. Additionally, the unemployment rate stood at 4.5
percent. Richard Moody, an analyst for real estate firm Mission
Residential, stated in a January 5 Wall Street Journal story:
“Perhaps the most noteworthy number in the December employment report is
the 0.5% increase in average hourly earnings…December's increase in
average hourly earnings reflects an over-the-year increase of 4.2
percent and, with the recent moderation in energy prices, workers’ wages
are now running above inflation.” Now where is that economy that only
benefits the rich?
Liberal
whining over phantom inequality and a discriminatory economy will only
increase when President Bush sends Congress his budget on February 5.
Anything short of a 100 percent tax rate proposal on individuals and
businesses will elicit liberal cries of budget cuts for children,
veterans, the elderly, birds, bees and funding to teach children the
birds and bees in government schools.
The
Democratic leaders are expectedly claiming their victory is a mandate
for any government-enforced tax, regulatory and spending idea they can
concoct. Their true goal is to claim just enough populist and class
warfare-driven victories to help ensure that they maintain control of
Congress, and enhance the chances of electing a Democratic president in
2008.
Liberals
are not only ignoring the facts, they are ignoring the threatened future
of this country, and individual initiative and responsibility in order
to achieve their not-so-new objective of an even bigger, inefficient and
intrusive federal government.
Wake up
America! The United States of America. Danger lies ahead!
To offer
feedback on this column,
click here.
© 2007 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # HC44.
Request permission to publish here.
|