Gregory D. Lee Read Greg's bio and previous columns here
May 1, 2009
Will the Supreme Court Decide It’s Time for Blacks to Stand
on Their Own Merit?
Last week the Supreme
Court heard arguments in Ricci v. DeStafano, which is one of
several cases the Court will hear this term concerning race and civil
rights.
This case stems from a
lawsuit filed by a group of white New Haven, Connecticut firefighters who
claim they were denied advancement when the city tossed out a promotion test
in which they did better than other experienced black firefighters did. New
Haven city officials reasoned that allowing the test scores to stand
potentially violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and that could
lead to lawsuits from the black firefighters who didn’t do as well as their
white counterparts. The Act requires that employers not rely on either
hiring or promotional tests that have a so-called “disparate impact” on
minorities.
In other words, if
you’re a black firefighter who didn’t study hard enough to do as well as a
white firefighter taking the same test, you can sue the city if it doesn’t
throw the test out. Conversely, if you’re a white firefighter and studied
hard to do well on the test, your hard work and studying is meaningless
under the Act. It should be obvious even to the O.J. Simpson murder trial
jury who the real victims of discrimination are.
When city governments
hire public safety civil servants and promote them solely on race instead of
their ability, everyone suffers. Residents suffer because they are saddled
with unqualified, taxpayer supported employees. It gets even worse when
these same incompetent people are promoted. Inferior supervisors will
invariably make bonehead decisions that can cost lives and property. Morale
within the city fire and police departments also suffers, eventually leading
to a buildup of resentment that will contribute to a toxic work environment.
I wonder how many studies there have been on the cause of employees “going
postal?”
Blacks who are hired
and promoted, thanks to the discriminatory Civil Rights Act of 1964, realize
they were promoted because of their race and not their ability. Qualified
blacks who do an outstanding job and do get promoted based on merit can’t
help but think that their white coworkers will always wonder if they were
promoted because of the color of their skin instead of their abilities. That
would upset me if I was a black and worked hard to get ahead. I wouldn’t
want to be stereotyped as getting promoted simply because I was black.
As a white male, I have
been subjected to so-called “reverse discrimination” during my entire adult
lifetime. Recently I experienced a combination of racial and age
discrimination when I applied for a community college instructor position.
Under today’s standards, if you are an older white guy, you have two strikes
against you before you even file an application. I thought an institution of
higher learning would naturally seek out the best qualified instructors
available for the benefit of its students. How naive could I have been? A
Hispanic with less education and far less law enforcement and teaching
experience got the position. I wasn’t even offered a job interview to
compete for the job.
Why should a white man
have to tell his children that despite hard work and accomplishment, they
can be passed over for a lesser-qualified person, solely based on his race?
How can lesser qualified blacks experience self-esteem when their promotion
is given to them simply because of their race?
For 45 years, the
federal government has mandated reverse discrimination and it is about time
it stopped. How can anyone justify its continued use when there is a black
president and black attorney general? The election of Barack Obama
demonstrates that race relations have come a long way since the 1960s.
Continued
discrimination against whites can no longer be justified and should have
never been tolerated. It’s time blacks stand on their own abilities when
competing for jobs and promotions.
Now the Supreme Court
has the opportunity to end racial discrimination and finally provide “equal
protection under the law” by finding this part of the Civil Rights Act
unconstitutional. But does it have the courage?
Gregory D. Lee is a nationally syndicated columnist for North
Star Writers Group. He can be contacted at info@gregorydlee.com.
© 2009 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission. Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum. To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it. This is Column # GL075. Request permission to publish here. |