data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bc81/3bc814c3fc0fb4fb01d4c19a815dea00d240efbe" alt=""
Gregory D.
Lee
Read Greg's bio and previous columns here
March
27, 2009
Judge
David F. Hamilton: The Beginning of Obama’s ‘Court of Empathy’
First
Judicial Nominee Reveals Obama’s Cards
Last week,
President Obama offered up U.S. District Judge David F. Hamilton as his
first judicial nominee to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Not surprisingly, the nomination of Judge Hamilton reveals what we can
expect from the president on future Supreme Court nominations, and the
future does not look pretty.
Last July,
presidential candidate Obama promised in a speech at a Planned
Parenthood conference to appoint judges with “empathy.” He cited a
recent Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion
as a “concerted effort to steadily roll back” abortion availability. He
went on to say, "We need somebody who's got the heart, the empathy, to
recognize what it's like to be a young teenage mom; the empathy to
understand what it's like to be poor, or African-American, or gay, or
disabled, or old. And that's the criteria by which I'm going to be
selecting my judges."
Apparently, someone with a record of following the Constitution won’t
even be considered.
The
Washington Post reported that the White House “held out Hamilton as
a prototype for the nominees Obama will seek as he reshapes the federal
appeals court – and by extension, the laws governing contentious social
issues such as abortion and affirmative action – during his presidency.”
According to the article, the White House also “touted him as the type
of moderate who could cool the nation’s long-simmering judicial
battles.” If Judge Hamilton is a moderate, then Ann Coulter is a
non-controversial wallflower and an extreme left-wing, tree-hugging,
abortion practicing liberal who idolizes Bill Clinton and thinks Al
Franken deserves to win the Minnesota U.S. Senate seat.
I say this
because Judge Hamilton is a card-carrying member of the American Civil
Liberties Union, an organization that is off-the-charts, far-left wing
and Marxist-inspired. He isn’t just a member of the ACLU, he sat on the
organization’s Indiana branch board. He also spent a month after college
raising funds door-to-door for ACORN, the same organization that
fraudulently registered large numbers of Obama supporters multiple times
to vote in last November’s election. I guess Judge Hamilton also has
empathy for crooked liberal Democratic politicians who cannot win
without a fixed election.
Judge
Hamilton’s prior judicial decisions illustrate he’s a man with empathy
instead of sound jurisprudence. In 2003, he struck down a portion of an
Indiana law that required abortion clinics to give women information
about alternatives to abortion in the presence of a physician or nurse.
Judge Hamilton ruled against it mostly because the information had to be
given to the woman 18 hours ahead of the abortion, requiring the woman
to make two visits to the clinic. His decision was overturned by a
higher court after appeal.
In 2005,
Judge Hamilton ruled unconstitutional the daily invocation of the
Indiana House because it too often referred to Jesus Christ and a
Christian God. He felt that the invocation showed preference for
Christianity over other religions. This decision was also promptly
overturned by a higher court. Do you see a pattern of empathy developing
here?
So,
according to President Obama, Judge Hamilton is perfect for a court of
appeals because he can show empathy toward lower court judges who don’t
follow the Constitution as a guide to determine whether a statute is
constitutional or not. He can empathize with the benefactors of
blatantly unconstitutional affirmative action programs and fraudulent
voting rolls, and at least sympathize with women who want to kill their
unborn babies.
Justice
Ruth Ginsberg has already hinted that she may retire soon after recently
experiencing health issues. Another Justice is 89 years old, and three
others are over 70. With geriatric statistics like that, the next four
to eight years can result in a lopsided ultra-liberal Court full of
Justices with an abundance of empathy instead of impartiality.
Gregory
D. Lee writes a weekly column for North Star Writers Group. He can be
reached through his web site: www.gregorydlee.com.
© 2009 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # GL070. Request permission to publish here. |