Gregory D.
Lee
Read Greg's bio and previous columns here
February 20, 2009
In Herring v. United States, Supreme Court Has
Liberals Screaming
The U.S. Supreme
Court’s 5-4 decision in Herring v. United States has
liberals in a tizzy. A Los Angeles Times editorial said the
decision concerning the exclusionary rule amounted to “chipping away at
the Constitution,” so that tells me it was the right decision.
The exclusionary rule
is a court invention that excludes “illegal” evidence during a criminal
trial. The Court’s reasoning for the ruling was to punish police
officers for “illegally” gathering evidence in order to deter such
misconduct in the future. The 1914 ruling initially applied to only
federal trials and later extended to state courts in 1961. The
exclusionary rule usually applies to search and seizure issues stemming
from the violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, but it
also applies to confessions.
Many law enforcement
officials argue that excluding any evidence denies juries critical
information they need to determine a defendant’s guilt or innocence. If
the police obtain evidence “illegally,” then discipline the individual
officer(s) involved, not society, by allowing a guilty person to escape
punishment and victimize others.
Liberals, on the other
hand, hate to see anyone but conservatives go to jail. They embrace the
exclusionary rule and call it visionary, enlightened and a reaffirmation
of the principles of the Constitution.
In Herring, the
issue was about simple human error on the part of a warrant clerk for an
Alabama county sheriff’s office, not devious police behavior to frame an
otherwise innocent man. A sheriff’s detective learned from an adjoining
county sheriff’s clerk that Herring had an outstanding warrant for his
arrest. When the detective located Herring driving his truck in his
county, he pulled him over and arrested him for the outstanding warrant.
He searched Herring’s person and pickup truck, incidental to his arrest
(which is completely normal and legal), and found a handgun.
Methamphetamine was also found in one of Herring’s pockets. By the time
the detective returned to his office with Herring, he learned the arrest
warrant was invalid and was supposed to have been withdrawn from the
computer system five months earlier, but it never was.
So what’s a detective
to do? Let Herring go? Should the Sheriff issue a written apology to
Herring, and return the “illegally seized” gun and dope to him? I’m sure
some liberals think so.
The detective referred
the matter to the feds, who indicted Herring for being an ex-con with a
gun and possession of drugs. He appealed his conviction to the 11th
Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the conviction. Herring then
appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The amazing thing to me
is that all four liberal Supreme Court Justices, that despite the fact
there was clearly no “police misconduct,” still felt compelled to side
with Herring. Even the moderate on the court, Justice Kennedy, exhibited
common sense in this ruling.
This case demonstrates
the reason Justices should be strict constructionists who follow the
Constitution, as opposed to Justices who make law from the bench.
Arguably one of the
most liberal Justices on the Court, Justice Ruth Ginsburg, wrote in the
dissenting opinion, “the police lacked
probable cause to believe he (Herring) was engaged in criminal activity.
The arrest and ensuing search therefore violated Herring’s Fourth
Amendment right to be secure . . . against ‘unreasonable searches and
seizures.’”
Fortunately for all of
us, five of the Justices recognized that the sheriff’s detective didn’t
need probable cause to arrest Herring because he honestly believed a
valid arrest warrant existed. Herring’s luck finally ran out when the
Justices made the right decision.
Justice Ginsburg is now
recuperating after surgery for pancreatic cancer and her future on the
Court is uncertain. President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee will
probably make her look like Rush Limbaugh.
Gregory D. Lee is a retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent and
author of
Practical Criminal Evidence. You can reach him through his web site:
www.gregorydlee.com.
© 2009 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # GL065. Request permission to publish here. |