October 18, 2006
Is This Really The Best We Can Do?
We're in the home stretch of the 2006 campaign season, and as best
as I can figure, these are the themes of the two parties' approaches to
winning voters:
Republicans: We're Not As Bad As The Democrats Would Be!
Democrats: If You Liked Seinfeld, You'll Love Our Campaign About
Nothing!
Not exactly the most positive, assertive slogans indicating the big
idea or two that defines each party. Yet it seems to be where each party
is. The GOP has been reduced to arguing against the alternative, rather
than for themselves. And while they're right that Democrats getting any
power back would be disastrous, it's hardly the strongest motivation.
Voting just to stick it to the opposition is the liberals' schtick,
especially where President Bush is concerned. There used to be a saying
in politics that you can't beat something with nothing, but the
Democrats are certainly trying to prove that axiom wrong. Maybe it's
because the something they're offering is the same tired leftism that
voters have been rejecting since 1994.
Perhaps a more truthful pair of slogans is in order:
Republicans: When it comes to all talk and no action, at least the
U.N. is still worse!
Democrats: Everything (and we mean everything) is
BushHitler's fault!
The GOP is supposed to be the home of conservatism, but I cant
seem to find anything conservative about them anymore. They seem almost
determined to become increasingly liberal so as to fill the vacuum left
by the Democrats as they fall further into the far left's clutches (and
please the biased mainstream media). Apparently they think a little lip
service and some fear mongering regarding the alternative is enough to
make conservatives sigh, pull the lever and accept two more years of
slouching leftward. They may have calculated correctly this time, but
one day they'll wake up in the minority as their former conservative
base will be gone. And the liberal media will keep lying, saying the GOP
wasn't liberal enough, when in fact its move to the left was precisely
the reason it lost conservative support.
As for the Democrats, they pretty much have to turn Bush into the
boogeyman. Its been so long since their socialist beliefs have moved
anyone. Even Bill Clinton, the last Democrat to win anything
significant, did so by sounding as conservative as he could. They simply
cannot be honest about what they really believe without sounding like
Marx or Lenin and scaring the crap out of people. So they invent a Bush
caricature with no basis whatsoever in the truth, and pin everything bad
that occurs, including weather (Katrina), Carter's and Clinton's
failures (Iran, N. Korea), etc. on him. Like the GOP, perhaps this will
work one time, but Bush is not running in 2008, nor 2006, for that
matter. Who will be the big bad enemy for Democrats to use to stoke
their base and distract from their communist principles then?
There cannot be two emptier vessels than the major political
parties right now. Neither will say what it really believes, which is
something to the left of what either will publicly admit to, much less
embrace. And the only way either can drum up "support" is to scare its
respective bases over how awful and/or evil the other one would be.
Perhaps together they're telling the truth, however inadvertently. Both
of them are awful and/or evil. When you can't even rile up the
rank-and-file, that tells you just how bad things have gotten and how
far things have fallen.
Political parties are supposed to coalesce around core ideas, serve
as a vessel to get folks elected who believe in those ideas and then
help implement those ideas as policies. But in 2006, you couldn't find
an idea if you tried. The last thing you're going to see in the next two
weeks is anything close to a real issue-driven debate. Perhaps there
actually is an inadvertent honesty in all this, in that it shows the one
and only core idea that truly drives both parties: acquiring and
maintaining power at all costs.
Is this really the best we can do?
© 2006 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # DKK30.
Request permission to publish here.
|