August 2, 2006
North
Korea: Sooner Rather Than Later
Last month,
North Korea
got the world's attention by launching several missiles in violation of
international law. None of them got very far off the ground, but with
the lessons learned from the failures (presuming they indeed were
failures and not intentional aborts), the most brutal and cruel
dictatorship on Earth came one substantial step closer to having the
ability to launch intercontinental ballistic missiles with nuclear
warheads. And the range on these weapons is sufficient to hit Alaska,
Hawaii and even the West Coast.
So what was the response? A lot of bluster and lip service and the
usual "threat" to get the utterly impotent U.N. (Useless Nations) to
issue even more of the same. The last time we went round this track, it
gave Saddam Hussein time to move whatever weapons he may have had into
Syria or elsewhere. (And it's presently accomplishing zilch with Iranian
dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.) Unfortunately, this time we're not
talking about older materials that, with any luck, might not have worked
anyway (not that it was a chance that could be taken regardless). This
is a much more dangerous situation, and waiting is most assuredly not
going to make it any less so.
We know that
North Korea
has the nuclear materials for the warhead. You can thank the Clinton
Administration for that. They were dumb enough to get played by a
lunatic dictator with Chia Pet-hair and a fetish for dressing like Ernst
Stavro Blofeld of the early "James Bond" movies. (Sure, we'll take an
evil thug at his word. He wouldn't lie, after all!) But that's
water under the bridge now. However he came by the stuff, he now
possesses it and must be dispossessed of it. If not, then every nation
within range will have to take preventive defensive measures. Some, like
Japan, already are.
It cannot be good for the stability of the entire Asian Pacific rim
to have every nation brandishing weapons (not to mention ever more
nervous trigger fingers), just in case. It reminds me of a line from
Hunt for Red October by the American Ambassador to the Soviet
Ambassador: "Can't you see how having your submarines and ours, your
ships and ours, close together is inherently dangerous?" Placing all
those weapons in close proximity, in the hands of people not accustomed
to them....well, let's just say they have a way of going off when no one
intends for them to.
Far better to not travel down that road in the first place, and
stop this before it gets any more out of hand than it already has. There
can be no arguing that the regime of Kim Jong Il has any legitimacy. He
oppresses, starves and kills his own people, having turned the entire
country into one abominable torture chamber, so much so that many try to
escape into
China at
risk of punishment worse than death. Let me repeat that. North Koreans
are willing to sneak into a communist dictatorship at the price
of unfathomable torment should they be discovered, caught and returned.
That is how awful life in Hell on Earth is.
Perhaps the only bigger crime is that the world has ignored the
horrific plight of the North Korean people and let them suffer so much
for so long. (Including, most appallingly of all, their South Korean
brethren. Apparently their cushy lifestyle can't be crimped by
unthinkable evil just a few miles to the north.) It's past time to come
to their rescue. Some will argue that Kim will take out
Seoul, or
that innocent North Koreans will be killed, should we try to remove him.
Waiting changes this how, exactly? It only raises the price and the
stakes that much further, in the expensive currencies of blood and
death. (And insofar as the North Korean people go, if any were killed
they might at least be put out of their misery once and for all. Those
who think this a silly statement clearly haven't any idea what kind of
evil really gets perpetrated north of the 38th parallel.)
It's not going to be easy, but the right thing to do virtually
never is. Nor will it be without cost, but the right thing to do is
virtually never free. It must be done. And we must come up with the
moral will to see this for the imperative that it is, and accept and
complete this difficult task. Or accept that we will have effectively
told the world that getting nukes makes you untouchable. (Yeah, that's
going to keep them from proliferating. Not.) I fear that, for our part,
we no longer have what our forefathers showed at places like
Normandy.
We would rather turn a blind eye than do what must be done. I sincerely
hope my fears are unfounded - for the War on Islamic Terror, for Iran
and for North Korea.
"If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done
quickly." --MacBeth, Act I, Scene 7
© 2006 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # DKK19.
Request permission to publish here.
|