May 17,
2006
Words
Mean Things, Or At Least They Used To
If
patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel, it would seem the
dictionary is the first these days. From President Clinton famously
redefining "sex" and almost unfathomably (even this far after the fact)
attempting to redefine "is"; from President Bush redefining "amnesty" to
same-sex marriage (or should I say "civil union") proponents
obliterating "husband" and "wife" in favor of the deliberately vague
"partner;" no one and nothing has taken the beating as of late that the
Queen's English has.
George
Orwell was all too prescient in his novel 1984 with his portrayal
of language being infinitely elastic and malleable, and thus very
suitable for scoundrels to cloak their actions. About the only thing he
missed was being about 20 years too early in timeframe. A few of my
favorites, in no particular order:
-
Treason Is
Patriotism -- This is my own paraphrase of Orwell, taken from the
far-left anti-Iraq War types who think publicly trashing America and
helping it to be defeated as best you can actually shows just how
much you "love" it. (If that's love, I don't particularly want to
see hate.)
-
Amnesty -- You
broke the law by entering America, and we're going to let you off
the hook for it, but dang it, it's not amnesty. Why not? Well, uh,
because it just isn't and we said so! (Never mind that my
dictionary couldn't provide a better description of what is being
proposed than its definition of amnesty: "The act of an authority
[as a government] by which pardon is granted to a large group of
individuals.")
-
Marriage --
Whether it's slapping same-sex couplings with the "civil unions"
label and pretending it's something different, or substituting
"partner" for "husband/wife" so as to obliterate the unique
procreative nature of the institution that necessarily disqualifies
all but one-man/one-woman pairings, the word marriage has been
taking a beating as of late.
-
Oral Sex Isn't
Sex -- Thanks to Clinton, stories of pre-teens casually "not
having sex" are now legion. The Real Clinton Legacy. One is
hard-pressed to believe that, absent this famous evasion, we would
be observing such an increase in this behavior.
-
Diversity --
Two criticisms: One, it's a fact and not a value. Two, as a general
rule, those who preach it the most (i.e. liberals) at times seem to
practice it the least (i.e. toward conservatives).
-
"Investing In
[blank]" -- Raising taxes and spending more.
-
"Cuts" --
Spending more than last year, but not as much more as some would
like. I've heard of "less is more," but this would be "more is
less."
-
Appropriate/Inappropriate -- Or as we used to call them, Right and
Wrong.
I
could go on for quite some time, but I trust my point is clear. Once
upon a time, words meant things – things that were fixed and unchanging.
And someone who tried to pull a fast one was called on it, if they even
tried in the first place, given how much more difficult it was to do
when there was no such thing as "spin." Not anymore. Now one has to give
an entire vocabulary refresher course before even beginning a
discussion, if spending the entire time simply arguing over definitions
is to be avoided. If we are ever to have a real and honest debate over
the major issues of the day, we must reclaim our language first. And if
it hurts or helps particular issues or causes or groups as a result, so
be it.
One
can laugh at this--and there is much to laugh about, to be sure--but
there is something much bigger at stake here. Clear language is a direct
reflection of the moral strength of a nation and a people. If we stand
idly by and let the things we hold dear be simply redefined out of
existence or morphed into other things we no longer recognize, what does
that say about us? Our willingness to defend the true meaning of words –
or lack thereof – will go a long way in determining just what our future
holds.
© 2006 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # DKK13.
Request permission to publish here.
|
|
|