September 12, 2007
While Dems Slander,
Gen. Petraeus Brings Forth Truth from Iraq
General David
Petraeus has finished two days of being insulted, slandered, browbeaten
and patronized by Democrats, which will have to pass for reporting to
Congress on the progress being made by the troop surge in Iraq. What we
found out, in the moments that those pompous, grandstanding blowhards
and the lunatic protesters in the gallery let him get a word in
edgewise, is that Iraq is coming along slowly but steadily, enough that
gradual troop drawdowns are scheduled to begin by spring.
This is good news
for everyone – except Democrats and their moonbat base, as they are
completely invested in defeat, though not so much as to do the one
honest thing and simply cut off the funding. That would make the
Democrats solely and totally responsible for the most-likely horrific
consequences. And they don't have the guts to accept that burden. So the
next logical step in making it up to MoveOn.org, DailyKos and Code Pink
for not doing as they demand (and keep the campaign donations flowing)
is to rhetorically shoot the messenger, which explains their reacting to
General Petraeus's plain-spoken truth the same way Dracula does to
sunlight and crucifixes. And, in turn, their reprehensible behavior
toward an honorable man doing his level best to accomplish a difficult
mission. (Whom these same Democrats unanimously appointed. If he was so
awful, why did they give him the job in the first place?)
In the two days
Petraeus spent trying to give a report, Democrats spent their time not
listening to him, accusing him of being a fool or a liar or both,
calling him a Bush administration puppet and other assorted calumnies.
Obviously, finding out what is really going on was the least of their
concerns. Discrediting what he said was the foremost – whether it be by
defaming his character, yammering on so he couldn't speak or wasting
time dealing with kook protesters who only got in the chambers because
Democratic staffers gave them gallery passes. (They certainly didn't get
in via the luck of the draw.)
This is what passes
for "oversight" in today's Democrat-run Congress – besmirching a good
man and turning what was supposed to have been two days of information
and insight into a total fiasco and a three-ring circus, simply because
you don't like what he's saying and you're scared of the reaction of
your own base. To conclude that Democrats are not fit to have power
would make one both a master of understatement and the obvious.
In spite of all
this, there was some very important news in Petraeus' report that should
be noticed by us all but will go unreported and thus unnoticed by most
anyway. And that is of how much Iran is blatantly interfering in our
effort in Iraq, up to and including facilitating attacks on our
soldiers.
Petraeus's report
could accurately be characterized as a damning indictment of the mullahs
in Tehran. (I counted no fewer than seven references to direct Iranian
responsibility for violence in Iraq during Petraeus's prepared
remarks.) When added to the regime's open pursuit of nuclear weapons
and Ahmedinejad's calls for Israel's destruction, it makes for a lengthy
list of charges.
Yet, far from
considering action against Iran, the Bush administration is preoccupied
with beating back liberal attempts to undercut the status quo in Iraq.
(And, to be fair, has yet to take Iran seriously either, or so it would
appear.) But if Petraeus is right, and I have no doubt that he is, the
U.S. cannot win in Iraq without dealing with Iran. Perhaps there is a
way to end their malicious interference in Iraq short of regime change.
I certainly hope so. But if not, we must be ready and willing to do what
is necessary with Iran in order to assure success in Iraq.
Nor can we risk
creating an enormous power vacuum into which Tehran would eagerly leap
with both feet by departing too soon. To do so would be the height of
irresponsibility, callousness and betrayal. And given what we've seen
the last couple of days, it would appear that we'll not only have to
fight against Al Qaeda and Iran, but the Democrats and their base too.
© 2007 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # DKK079.
Request permission to publish here.
|