September 3, 2007
Senator Larry Craig
and Hypocrisy
As regular as the
changing of the seasons, another congressional sex scandal has hit the
public.
This time, it's U.S.
Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID), who is resigning after it became known that he
pled guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct for allegedly soliciting
oral sex from an undercover police officer conducting a sting operation
in a public bathroom at the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport.
Before I get to the
political ramifications, a few thoughts and questions on this situation.
The only reason the cop was there was because the bathrooms in the
airport had become so notorious for the solicitation of anonymous,
random gay trysts that public safety required the police to intervene. I
would think that most parents wouldn't want to send their young son in
there only to have him observe that sort of thing. Or witness it
themselves, for that matter.
How far have we
fallen as a society that men cruising for random gay sex in public
restrooms be it airports, shopping malls or freeway rest stops is
taken as a given and doesn't even raise eyebrows? Are we so crippled by
political correctness that we can't even assure the citizenry of its
ability to urinate without getting propositioned or at least observing
such? Are we so unable to delineate right from wrong that we can't even
require people to get a hotel room? If we have reached the point where
random humping in the toilet or the solicitation thereof morphs into a
civil rights issue, we have seriously jumped the tracks as a society and
are headed for someplace very unpleasant. (And lest you think that an
over-reaction, suppose someone did react in an aggressively negative way
to such a solicitation; you want to wager they wouldn't be charged with
a "hate crime"?)
Now then, onto this
matter of "hypocrisy," a charge always leveled any time that anyone who
is or is perceived as conservative stumbles behaviorally.
There is an old
saying: "Hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to virtue." Which is
worse talking about sin, even while you admit you're a sinner
yourself, or denying that sin exists and using that as justification for
all manner of licentiousness? Are we really better off having no moral
standards at all, to the point of endorsing random copulation in the
crapper, than to have a moral standard even as we realize that we all
will on occasion fall short of it?
Which is more
hypocritical upholding a moral standard of behavior even while
acknowledging your own inability to live up to it at times, or ripping
conservatives for behavior that would receive nowhere near the same
level of attention if perpetrated by a liberal (as proven by Ted
Kennedy, Gerry Studds, Barney Frank, Bill Clinton and many others)
purely for partisan reasons?
Which is more
hypocritical holding people accountable for their misdeeds, or
reacting with mock outrage over behavior that you otherwise think fine
and dandy, except for the fact that someone of the opposite party did it
and so you see a chance to exploit it for political advantage? (If Craig
had received his fellatio in the Oval Office as Clinton did, I presume
Democrats would be fine with it.)
And finally, which
is more hypocritical getting the resignation of elected officials who
besmirch their offices and embarrass their constituents and their party,
or defending them to the hilt (Clinton), repeatedly re-electing them
(Kennedy, Studds) and promoting them to party leadership (Frank and
Kennedy)?
Whatever the faults
of the Republican Party and its elected officials, the last
people who have any right to throw stones are Democrats. And for them to
do so is far more disturbing than whatever may have happened in an
airport bathroom, unsettling as that is. For the former has the capacity
to affect many more people than just those who are traveling, need to
relieve themselves and happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong
time.
© 2007 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # DKK077.
Request permission to publish here.
|