April 2, 2007
The Liberal Borg:
Resistance Is Not Futile
"We are the Borg. Lower
your shields and surrender your ships. Your culture will adapt to
service us. Resistance is futile."
With the above
phrasing, the Borg began their every encounter with an alien species on
"Star Trek: The Next Generation." They flew around in cube-shaped
vessels, drones functioning as a single mind, their individuality
ruthlessly suppressed and freedom extinguished, relentlessly attempting
to assimilate all life forms they met into their collective and the
perfection they felt they represented. And they were perhaps the most
frightening and effective enemy the crew of the starship Enterprise ever
went up against.
So too it is with the
forces of the liberal left in America today. About the only saving grace
in their attempts to seal her defeat in the War on Islamic Terror and
re-make her in their Marxist image is that they are no longer hiding
what their true intents and beliefs are. They, like the Borg, are at
least announcing themselves and their intentions. And they are simply to
reverse the result of the Cold War and turn this nation into a Communist
paradise. (Or, more accurately, hell.)
I can hear you
objecting already to my having used the C-word, but stay with me for a
minute on this. When one examines what the liberal left is truly
pursuing, I believe there can be no other way to properly describe it.
Hatred of the private
sector. The
left never passes up any opportunity to expand government and shrink the
private sector. They've already taken over education from kindergarten
through college and are targeting pre-school next. (All the better to
start assimilating your kids into the collective as soon as possible.)
Then there's health care, of which liberals are openly trying to stage a
government takeover. Don't forget the whole "global warming" fraud and
what it would do to restrict free enterprise. Finally, is there any tax
they wouldn't jack up to kingdom come if they could? What simpler way to
wipe out the private sector than to provide a disincentive for
productivity and steal as much of what still is produced as possible in
one fell swoop?
And while they may not
have flat-out nationalized large portions of the economy yet, remember
they need not do so in order to have control over it. To quote Ronald
Reagan: "Now it doesn't require expropriation or confiscation of
private property or business to impose socialism on a people. What does
it mean whether you hold the deed or the title to your business or
property if the government holds the power of life and death over that
business or property?" Thanks to government regulations, businesses can
be wiped out with the single stroke of a pen. (Just ask any bar owner
who had to close down after a smoking ban took his clientele away.) To
say nothing of what the trial lawyer lobby can do (being, as they are, a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party).
Totalitarian press.
The Soviet
Union had Pravda and Tass, which pretended to be news outlets but were
really just propaganda mills for the Kremlin. We have the New York
Times and CBS. Liberals control nearly every potential information
outlet, from newspapers and network TV to Hollywood. (And, of course,
the aforementioned education machine.) Like their Soviet predecessors,
these institutions are used to spew the party line and browbeat
opponents into submission. And to see what liberals really think (and
mean to do if given the chance), simply look at how much they hate and
want to shut down any quasi-conservative outlet that manages to break
through their monopolistic control, such as Fox News or talk radio.
("Fairness Doctrine", anyone?) Or what they would do with
"campaign-finance reform." (Gag anyone who dares criticize an incumbent
politician or his party...unless it's MoveOn.org slandering the few
remaining conservatives.) The First Amendment would be put through the
paper-shredder once and for all.
Private
property/freedom of association.
From smoking bans, to
fatty foods, to banning incandescent light bulbs, to banning parental
spanking, to forcing recognition of "gay marriage," there is simply
nothing that the left will leave to individuals to decide or choose for
themselves. Businesses will not be allowed to choose their own policies
or to which customers and clientele they will cater, as if anyone must
work at any particular employer or patronize any particular
establishment. Citizens will not be allowed to furnish their homes or
discipline their children as they see fit, as if any of that is
government's business at all. Much like Gulliver being tied down with a
hundred Lilliputian strings, so too will our every move be monitored to
make sure each is the "right" one. If it isn't, we simply won't be
allowed to make it anymore. (Gotta stamp out that individuality before
it hurts the collective.)
Though truth be told,
this isn't really about those individual "strings"; it's about making
sure we "Gullivers" can't get up. If everyone is a "criminal" in some
way, then the moment any of us dares to threaten the left's power, they
have flimsy, phony grounds on which they can trump up the authority to
crush us. Liberty doesn't exist if a property owner cannot choose to
utilize it as he sees fit. Freedom of association must, by definition,
include the freedom not to associate, or it's not freedom at all. In
other words, it should not matter one whit if you don't like the
particular behavior involved; you should defend to the death the right
to engage in it. After all, the moment your favorite activity becomes
sufficiently unpopular and in the minority, you'll be the next target.
If I may paraphrase an old essay: First they came for the smokers, but I
wasn't a smoker, so I didn't complain . . .
Add it all up, and you
get communism in all its facets. And it explains why the left is so
determined to surrender in the War on Terror. They simply share radical
Islam's hatred of America. The question is when will we see that both
entities are equally determined enemies of those principles upon which
America was founded, for which she stands, and which we as her citizens
supposedly hold dear? And that resistance of both is most definitely not
futile?
To offer
feedback on this column,
click here.
© 2007 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
Click here to join our discussion forum
and talk directly with our writers and editors about this column and
others!
This
is Column # DKK054.
Request permission to publish here.
|