February
12, 2007
House
Republicans: The Ship Keeps Sinking
I guess I’m
supposed to be outraged or something because House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
is getting access to a large Air Force jet for trips back home to San
Francisco.
Yawn.
If the
House Speaker would institute a flat tax, dismantle the Department of
Education and withdraw America from the United Nations, she could fly on
a double-decker jumbo jet with a personal masseuse, live bands and
individually prepared meals.
I’d cook.
Acts of
extravagance by elected officials always seem like good grist for
rivals’ soundbites, but they are the emptiest of political messages. As
such, the decision by House Republicans to jump all over Pelosi about
the plane is a poor indication of the GOP’s readiness to reclaim control
of the national debate.
“An
extravagance of power that the taxpayers won’t swallow!” huffs Rep. Adam
Putnam, the number three man in the House Republican leadership.
Because, of course, an elected official availing his or herself of a
perk is heretofore unimagined in America.
Besides,
when the GOP controlled the House, they didn’t gang rape the taxpayers
with billions in pork barrel earmarks for projects like the Alaska
Bridge to Nowhere. Oh wait. They did. And taxpayers decided that if they
were going to have a big-spending party in charge of Congress, they
might as well elect the one that celebrates government spending with
every fiber of its being. Why elect faux Democrats when you can have the
real thing?
The
Republican approach to the Pelosi plane uproar – which is to say, their
decision to cause an uproar – does not see them off to a good start as
the new minority party. Minority parties can basically take one of two
approaches: 1. Whine, complain, accuse and generally snipe at the
majority about everything (see: Democrats, 1995-2006); or 2. Bring forth
bold policy initiatives, knowing full well that they can’t pass in the
current environment, but nonetheless advocate for great ideas and keep
fighting for their place on the national agenda.
Minority
parties who take the first approach either have no ideas or have no
confidence in their ideas. Then again, what ideas would we expect the
House Republicans to have? When they were in the majority, they spent
like drunken sailors while declining to take on any of the nation’s most
pressing problems, like Social Security reform or domestic energy
production.
Once in the
minority, they elected pretty much the same crew of leaders that took
their ship down in the first place. Ideas? From this bunch?
The current
House Republican minority acts more like its antecedent under the
ineffectual Bob Michel, the longtime Minority Leader For Life who
accepted his role as Tip O’Neill’s lapdog and never in a million years
expected to capture the majority. Michel knew the system when the
Democrats ran the show in those days. It was all about individual
members bringing home the bacon to their districts. If Bob could be
Tip’s pal, Republicans wouldn’t be completely barred from riding the
gravy train.
The new
Democratic majority will do much that deserves to be criticized. Word is
they may attempt to close Guantanamo Bay prison. They will certainly try
to prevent President Bush’s tax cuts from becoming permanent. They will
surely launch any number of politically motivated, sham investigations.
When they do, House Republicans should criticize. It is their job to
speak up about substantive issues.
But even
there, one wonders if they will make truly substantive arguments.
Guantanamo is an invaluable tool for gathering intelligence from
captured terrorists, and if the rest of the world doesn’t like it, too
bad. Will they say that? Or will they read the poll numbers and wimp
out?
Then again,
maybe they can just complain about airplane use by the speaker. What an
outrageous abuse of taxpayer money! Earmarks for projects in Republican
districts – now that’s an appropriate abuse of taxpayer money.
Conservative ideas are winners when offered by champions who present
them with the enthusiasm and optimism they deserve. But it takes an
intellectual heavyweight to win that battle of ideas. Slugs like these
will stick with what they know, so we should probably expect more of
approach number one.
Whine,
complain, offer nothing. Just the plan to usher in a generation in the
minority.
© 2007 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # DC72.
Request permission to publish here.
|