Candace
Talmadge
Read Candace's bio and previous columns
April 10, 2008
William E. Odom: Iraq
Testimony from a Different General
We’ve heard it all before.
Despite all the hot air it generated, testimony on Iraq this week before
the Senate Armed Services Committee offered little in the way of real
news or useful insight. Hiding behind Army Gen. David Petraeus’s medals
and uniform, President Bush sent his proxy to Capitol Hill to repeat the
administration’s threadbare mantras yet another time.
Just six days earlier, however, a different high-ranking U.S. military
officer spoke to the senators – Lt. Gen. William E. Odom, now retired.
“The surge is prolonging instability, not creating the conditions for
unity as the president claims,” his testimony began.
“The decline in violence reflects a dispersion of power to dozens of
local strong men who distrust the government and occasionally fight
among themselves,” Odom explained. “Thus the basic military situation is
far worse because of the proliferation of armed groups under local
military chiefs who follow a proliferating number of political bosses.
“This can hardly be called greater military stability, much less
progress toward political consolidation, and to call it fragility that
needs more time to become success is to ignore its implications.”
Persuading the Sunnis not to shoot at U.S. troops comes at a high
financial toll. “ . . . Our new Sunni friends insist on being paid for
their loyalty,” Odom pointed out. “I have heard, for example, a rough
estimate that the cost of in one area of about 100 square kilometers is
$250,000 per day. And periodically they threaten to defect unless their
fees are increased.”
In
other words, the short-sighted tactic of paying one faction not to shoot
at U.S. troops is setting Iraq up for long-term fighting between
multiple factions by giving one side the funds needed to buy arms and
pay militia members.
Odom also made hash of claims that Al Qaeda will have a staging area in
Iraq for further attacks against the United States if we withdraw our
entire military presence.
“The Sunnis will soon destroy Al Qaeda if we leave Iraq,” Odom said.
“The Kurds do not allow them in their region, and the Shiites, like the
Iranians, detest Al Qaeda. To understand why, one need only take note of
the Al Qaeda public diplomacy campaign over the past year or so on
Internet blogs. They implore the United States to bomb and invade Iran
and destroy this apostate Shiite regime.
“As an aside, it gives me pause to learn that our vice
president and some members of Congress are aligned with Al Qaeda on
spreading the war to Iran.”
That should give all of us pause. Odom’s entire testimony is 180 degrees
opposite of what we keep hearing from clueless pundits on all sides and
nightly news broadcasts.
So
what do we do now? As a first step, Odom urged withdrawal from Iraq of
all U.S. troops rapidly but in good order. “Only that step can break the
paralysis now gripping U.S. strategy in the region,” he said.
Next, he advised the senators, is to establish a new aim of regional
stability, “not a meaningless victory in Iraq.” To make progress toward
that stability, however, the United States must alter its approach to
Iran.
“If the president merely renounced his threat of regime change by force,
that could prompt Iran to lessen its support of Taliban groups in
Afghanistan,” Odom pointed out. “Iran detests the Taliban and supports
them only because they will kill more Americans in Afghanistan as
retaliation in event of a U.S. attack on Iran.
“Iran’s policy toward Iraq would have to change radically as we
withdraw,” Odom continued. “It cannot want instability there. Iraqi
Shiites are Arabs and they know that Persians look down on them.
Cooperation between them has its limits.”
Odom concluded: “Naysayers insist that our withdrawal will create
regional instability. This confuses cause with effect. Our forces in
Iraq and our threat to change Iran’s regime are making the region
unstable. Those who link instability with a U.S. withdrawal have it
exactly backwards. Our ostrich strategy of keeping our heads buried in
the sands of Iraq has done nothing but advance our enemies’ interest.”
No
one has said it better. If we possess even a straw of wisdom, we will
follow this general’s advice.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column #CT089.
Request permission to publish here. |