Paul
Ibrahim
Read Paul's bio and previous columns
June 30, 2008
Democrats Can Dream,
But Here’s Why Barack Obama Will Lose Virginia
There is nothing that has fascinated Democrats this election
cycle more than the prospect of their nominee winning Virginia in
November. It would indeed be the Democrats’ first time to do so in more
than 40 years, and the idea of cutting into the Republicans' hold on the
south is, understandably, extremely exciting for them (although if they
have set foot in Northern Virginia, which contains a third of the
state's votes, they would understand the foolishness of interpreting a
Virginia victory as anything resembling the takeover of a “southern”
state.)
Nonetheless, that is all they are talking about. They are,
however, quite off in their expectations. Despite the
groupthink-generated excitement, an objective look at Virginia most
likely leads to the conclusion that Barack Obama does not, in fact, have
that much “hope” of winning the state.
The Democrats have been basing their hopes of winning
Virginia on the gubernatorial victory of Tim Kaine in 2005, the
senatorial victory of Jim Webb in 2006 and former Governor Mark Warner’s
poll lead in the upcoming election to fill retiring Sen. John Warner’s
Senate seat.
But let us not forget that, first of all, the three are quite
conservative by Democrats’ standards. Webb, in fact, endorsed George
Allen in 2000, the same Republican he defeated six years later. Obama,
on the other hand, is the most liberal member of the Senate, and as such
will not be able to dip into the same constituencies upon which the
centrist Democrats were able to rely.
This is of course not to mention that the victories of even
these centrist Democrats were quite narrow, and Webb's was razor-thin –
so close, in fact, that judging by the behavior of Democrats in recent
years, George Allen would have dropped his classiness to demand a
recount had he himself been a Democrat.
Further, the Republicans' gubernatorial candidate, Jerry
Kilgore, was far from the best that the Virginia GOP could come up with,
and more importantly, ran an awful campaign. As for George Allen, he
held a 20-point lead before making the "macaca" comment that was
unnecessarily exploded by the media. Had it not been for this unique
low point in American political history, Allen would have cruised toward
reelection and most likely toward a competitive bid for the Republican
presidential nomination.
The Democratic optimists must also not forget that the
results of previous presidential elections are far more reflective of a
state's future presidential picks than smaller state-wide races will
ever be. And in that department, Virginia is solidly Republican. George
W. Bush won it by 8.1 percentage points in 2000 and slightly increased
his lead to 8.2 percentage points in 2004.
In 2001, in between the two Bush victories, Democrat Mark
Warner won his gubernatorial race by over five percentage points, which
is far greater than Kaine’s and Webb’s narrow victory margins in 2005
and 2006. Warner’s victory said virtually nothing about how the state
would vote in 2004, and there is no reason to believe that even less
impressive Democratic victories would say anything about 2008.
In addition to basing their optimism on the recent victories
of their candidates, Democrats are looking at two additional factors
that they hope would work in their favor. One is the rapid growth of
Northern Virginia, which, they have noticed, has been leaning left in
recent years.
But this is far from a new phenomenon. Northern Virginia in
2004 went solidly for John Kerry, who had greater than two-to-one
margins in Arlington County and the city of Alexandria, and smaller
victory margins in Fairfax County and the city of Fairfax. These
counties and cities grew enormously between 2000 and 2004, yet Bush
still won Virginia by a slightly greater margin in 2004 than he did in
2000. The growth has since slowed significantly in these areas, and the
electoral effect will be even smaller in 2008. The main exception is the
still fast-growing Loudoun County, which Bush won narrowly in 2004, but
it simply remains too small to contribute significantly to an Obama
victory in November.
The second additional factor to which Democrats are clinging
is the state’s significant black community, which makes up 19.6 percent
of Virginia’s population. In 2004, however, Virginia blacks cast 21
percent of the votes, and 87 percent of them went to John Kerry. Judging
by their voting numbers, Virginia blacks were already enthusiastic in
2004, so how much more enthusiastic can they be this November? And how
many more of them could Obama win over? There simply isn’t much room
left in the black community for the Democrats to expand their lead in
2008. Besides, any negligible gains they do make among blacks will be
far outweighed by John McCain’s absorption of Virginia’s huge veteran
vote and its rural white population.
In short, Barack Obama will lose Virginia because it is still
a conservative state, and because the situation has not improved as much
for the Democrats as they would have us believe. If Obama wants to win
in November, he would be better off focusing on true swing states.
© 2008 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # PI116.
Request
permission to publish here.
|