Nathaniel
Shockey
Read Nathaniel's bio and previous columns
here
July 29, 2008
Global Warming and the
Faith of the Brainwashed
That global warming has continued to captivate the media, car companies,
energy companies and so many more demonstrates how enormously
brainwashed Americans are.
Still convinced that “the entire global
scientific community has a consensus on the question that human beings
are responsible for global warming,” like Al Gore purported?
Please.
For starters, in November 2005, Swiss researchers from the journal
Quaternary Science Reviews overtly stated, “Whatever slight impact
humans might have on the climate, it is too small to measure.”
Bob Carter, an environmental scientist at James Cook University
testified before a U.S. Senate Committee, saying, “Lower atmosphere
satellite-based temperature measurements, if corrected for
non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic
eruptions, show little if any global warming since 1979, a period over
which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17 percent).” We’re
obviously not causing the type of damage we thought we were.
And if you’re still worried about the polar ice caps melting, the
National Snow and Ice Data Center has reported that ice caps are not
shrinking, but have actually increased in size and concentration from
1980 to 2008.
David Evans, a consultant to the Australian Greenhouse Office from 1999
to 2005, shared in an article for The Australian that his initial
reaction to the theory and buzz of global warming in 1999 was one of
excitement, feeling “useful and fairly important; we were saving the
planet.” He goes on to explain a few points:
“The signature of an
increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the
atmosphere over the tropics . . . The greenhouse signature is missing.
We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.
“There is no evidence
to support the idea that carbon emissions cause significant global
warming. None. There is plenty of evidence that global warming has
occurred, and theory suggests that carbon emissions should raise
temperatures (though by how much is hotly disputed) but there are no
observations by anyone that implicate carbon emissions as a significant
cause of the recent global warming.
“The satellites that
measure the world's temperature all say that the warming trend ended in
2001, and that the temperature has dropped about 0.6C in the past year.
“None of these points
is controversial. The alarmist scientists
agree with them, though they would dispute their relevance.”
I
probably have significantly punier scientific knowledge than Al Gore,
but it is fairly obvious that Gore’s entire premise for his misleading
documentary, that we are causing global warming, is questionable at
best, and most likely false.
What is truly upsetting about all of this is not that so many of us were
duped. It’s that so many of us are still duped.
American companies are still spending huge quantities in order to cater
to this fraudulent belief. Instead of actually improving their products
in ways that actually enhance efficiency and, hence, the strength of the
company and the American economy, they’re catering to the brainwashed.
Judging by their “We can do this” campaign, Pacific Gas and Electric is
still very comfortably convinced that global warming is inevitable,
unless we all act quickly.
And in addition to the businesses, we have politicians who are either a)
still clinging to empty threats about global warming or b) have seen the
holes in the alleged global warming crisis but are too scared to take on
the media. Is an alarmist theory that has been all but smothered really
worth $6 trillion, which is what the proposed cap-and-trade climate bill
is estimated to cost the U.S. by 2050? Does anyone else think this is
crazy?
It
smells a lot like a control issue to me, but who knows? Maybe there are
a lot of ill-informed people who are just really concerned . . . and we
elected them to represent us.
Feel free to reach your own conclusions about why so many are still
convinced of a totally unconvincing theory. But it is imperative that
those of us who have learned to question global warming have the courage
to say so. Our country can’t afford a government that wastes absurd
amounts of taxpayer dollars fighting windmills.
Correction:
Statistics cited in this column from the National Snow and Ice Data
Center were not accurate, according to representatives from that
national organization who contacted North Star Writers Group following
its publication and distribution. Click here for their most recent
analysis:
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/index.html. We regret the error.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column #
NS125.
Request permission to publish here. |