Nathaniel
Shockey
Read Nathaniel's bio and previous columns
here
February 18, 2008
Technology . . . And
How We Use It
I’ve been thinking
about what I’ll sound like when I tell my grandkids, “You know what, I
was in sixth grade when they invented e-mail. Back then, we used a
communication program called ‘AIM.’ Oh, and by the way, sixth graders
were about 11 years old in my day, not 15, like they are today. We were
cleverer back then.”
“But Grandpa,”
they’ll say, “you mean that you were alive before they invented
computers? Did you have a pet dinosaur?”
I was in middle
school when my teacher showed us, on video, an example of two people
“instantly messenging” each other. My classmates and I were pretty
floored. But personally, I was not as shocked as I was wondering, with
confusion, “Why do we need this?”
The same thing
happened to me when I saw a commercial for text messaging a few years
ago, back when it was a novelty. There was some guy and he had hurt his
wife/girlfriend’s feelings. She was looking upset at a business meeting
when he shows up at the door, unannounced, holding a sign saying, “I’m
sorry.” Then he grabs another one that says something like, “I was
stupid,” followed by, “I love you.” Then they cut to her reading these
messages on her phone, with a big smile on her face, and I’m thinking to
myself, “Are relationships really that easy?” But even more than that, I
remember saying, out loud, “Give me one other useful application of this
‘text messaging.’”
And this is one
reason I know that I’m a conservative, because I’ll always question the
usefulness of anything new, not because I’m a skeptic and a thinker, but
because I’m lazy and would prefer things to get no more complicated than
they already are.
Before instant
messaging (and Myspace, Facebook and any other communication tool they
use on the Internet), computers were really only used in the public
sphere for typing. Word processors, they were called, and we used them
to type documents with considerably less skill than was required to use
typewriters. Now we can talk to each other without having to immediately
form sentences using our mouths. We can take a few extra seconds and say
something especially witty, and depending on one’s skill level,
considerably lengthy texts can be written within seconds, heightening
the impression of one’s quick wits.
When I started using
instant messenger, I realized I was much better at talking to people
online than I was in person. I’ve always been better at communicating
when I’m looking at the words I’m thinking than when I have to
immediately create audible sound. Even now, when I get stuck in
conversation, my wife says, “Use your words,” and I’m thinking to
myself, “Which ones? Is there a manual for this sort of thing?” But
online, I was talking to six or seven people at once, dazzling them all
with my quick, impersonal wit.
But what are the
effects of this age of inaudible, written communication? For one, there
are probably a lot more writers out there, although I’d hesitate to say
there are better writers, because I think the best writers are equally
skilled speakers. Which brings me to a second effect –speakers, like me.
I don’t think people
are very good at communicating with one another. Few of us are able to
realize our honest thoughts and communicate them when appropriate. Most
of us say things that we know are impersonal, light, possibly funny and
definitely safe, because we’ve said them all a thousand times before. In
California, we say things like, “no worries,” every other sentence. The
other half, we’re either saying “whatever,” or “I drank so much the
other night.” I’d like to think there’s a little more to us.
Technology is not
the problem. The problem is the way people use it. There is always a
period during which we learn the various uses of new technology, its
advantages and its potential pitfalls. You might call it a grace period.
One of my English
Literature professors was once talking to our class about the great
advances we’ve made in technology over the years. But then he said, “And
here we are, alone, talking to each other across the hallway on our
computers,” which I’ve done.
In the age of
written communication, we have to be careful that we don’t lose that
which makes us the most human, and that which makes humanity so special.
As comfortable as it may seem now, it won’t compare to the pain we’ll
feel when we find ourselves, generations from now, talking to our
grandkids about the wonderful relationships we never really had.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column #
NS097.
Request permission to publish here. |