Llewellyn
King
Read Llewellyn's bio and previous columns
June 30, 2008
Press Coverage of the
White House Nearing a Crisis
The White House press corps is having a crisis. It may not interest the
rest of the country much, but the problems in the Fourth Estate will, in
due time, impact the nature and the completeness of White House
coverage.
The ostensible trigger to the current crisis involves the so-called pool
reports by members of the print media traveling with the president. But
there are deeper problems with the way the presidency is covered by the
media.
The White House Correspondents' Association wants to restrict the
dissemination of the pool reports. But this action brings up the whole
issue of who can afford to travel with the president, when overseas
trips cost around $25,000 per correspondent.
The pool is a subset of the press corps traveling with the president,
and it is formed in rotation. The pool consists of a print reporter, a
wire service reporter, a still photographer, a radio reporter and a
television crew. Poolers travel on Air Force One in order to be close
to the president. At some level, it is a death watch.
The purpose of the pool is to tell reporters who cannot be accommodated
on Air Force One what happened on board or at events, such as a Vatican
visit.
In
Washington, the in-town pool accompanies the president to all events
where a lot of reporters cannot be admitted, including Oval Office
visits by foreign dignitaries, party fund-raising events at private
homes and bicycling trips.
Poolers file a brief, colorful and sometimes witty report of the
goings-on, or the frustration of being kept from the action. Often, the
pool is confined to vans or holding rooms.
The in-town pool rotation works fairly smoothly. The problem is with
out-of-town travel, which is so expensive that only the richest news
organizations – primarily television and deep-pocketed newspapers – can
afford to send their correspondents on a regular basis.
The pool reports are a press corps tradition – a part of the whole
business of covering the White House. From time to time, those who write
the reports have felt that their work is benefiting reporters who have
not paid their way either in pool duty or in expensive travel.
Now some of those reporters, backed up by the board of the White House
Correspondents' Association, want to limit the distribution of the pool
reports. Their argument is one of pay-to-play, and those making it work
for major broadcast outlets and newspapers like The New York Times.
Things have gotten worse for traveling poolers because of the waning
interest in the Bush Administration, the financial difficulties of the
newspapers and magazines and the shifting of talent and money to the
campaigns. Ergo, reporters like Sheryl Stolberg of The New York Times
have to file more pool reports on top of their regular work. They see it
as an imposition. They want to do short reports for their traveling
colleagues, not for the entire White House press corps, to say nothing
of the blogosphere.
Traditionally, pool reports were on paper and could only be collected in
the White House press room, thus limiting their readership. So the
writers could be irreverent, funny and could castigate the White House
in a between-ourselves way.
I
have to say that I used to publish these reports in a newsletter called
White House Weekly. I received no complaints from reporters who
seemed to enjoy their new outlet. The Clinton White House sought to stop
me and others and failed. The Bush White House has taken a different
tack. They disseminate the pool reports to anyone who wants them,
including lobbyists and bloggers far from Washington. Consequently, the
writers have become more circumspect, their criticism of White House
arrangements more mute and their jokes subdued.
The traveling press is now saying: Why should we do this? This is not
our job and we are not paid for it.
The new arrangements sanctioned by the White House Correspondents'
Association's board, which is chaired by Ann Compton of NBC News and
made up almost entirely of representatives of rich news organizations,
might have stood, if it had not been for a protest filed by one of the
most respected reporters at the White House. He is Mark Silva – a wise
and witty writer who covers the White House for The Chicago Tribune.
If there were a Pulitzer Prize for pool writing, it would go to Silva.
His argument is that it is hard enough to get information out of the
White House, and if the pool reports are filed to only a small section
of the media, the public's right to know will be infringed. Silva wrote
to his colleagues in the association expressing his concerns. That
resulted in a flurry of e-mails and will probably lead to
reconsideration of how pool reports are written and disseminated.
Underlying the problems with pool reports are the problems with covering
the White House itself.
Permanent White House correspondents are kept in a bubble. They are
briefed twice a day – at the off-camera gaggle at 9:30 a.m. and the
formal televised briefing at 12:30 p.m. Presidential press conferences
and special briefings are few and far between. Otherwise White House
pass holders have no advantage over members of the press from, say,
Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Travel is important because it exposes reporters to the White House
staff. But it has become too expensive for most newspapers and wire
services. Worse, when the White House wants to get the word out, it
often bypasses the White House press corps and goes directly to big-name
journalists and television presenters.
For their part, the news organizations tend to pull their best reporters
out of the White House as soon as they begin to make their mark. Dana
Milbank of The Washington Post, Elizabeth Bumiller of The New
York Times, David Gregory of NBC News and Campbell Brown of CNN were
pulled out by their employers when their White House coverage was
reaching a crescendo. Also, many newspapers have totally given up on
covering the White House.
Whether the press corps likes it or not, change is at hand. At least the
White House Correspondents' Association still gives the best party in
Washington.
© 2008 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # LK052.
Request permission to publish here. |