ABOUT US  • COLUMNISTS •  NEWS/EVENTS • FORUM • ORDER FORM • RATES • MANAGEMENT • CONTACT

Llewellyn

King

 

 

Read Llewellyn's bio and previous columns

 

April 14, 2008

No Easy Answers in the Emerging World Food Crisis

 

Unexpectedly, the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank in Washington were dominated not by discussions of the global credit crisis, but by another global crisis – food.

 

While the poorest of the poor are hurting the most, a large swathe of the population of Asia, and other parts of the world, can no longer afford its daily bread or rice. In Egypt, Haiti and the Philippines, there have already been riots amid rising food prices.

 

Commodity prices are at all-time historical highs, often three times higher than they were a year ago. In much of the world stocks are at their lowest levels in three decades, suggesting higher prices to come. Particularly egregious is the price of rice, which is causing near famine in Bangladesh, India and the Philippines.

 

Many factors have combined to produce a world food crisis that will not be solved in a hurry, according to IMF and World Bank officials.

 

The two most identifiable sources of stress on world food supply are the rapid growth in population and the high price of fuel. But there are many others, including:

 

l        The new prosperity of Asia has tempted farmers to feed the new taste of the middle class for meat and luxury crops at the expense of staples.

l        American and European farmers have diverted high-yield corn and soybean crops from food to biofuels.

l        American and European consumers have been reluctant to embrace bioengineering.

l        Agricultural land around the world that has been surrendered to other uses, from housing estates to golf courses.

 

The global response to the newest crisis is neither easy nor clear. Designating money to buy food for the poor could exacerbate the rise of global food prices, and would not result in increased production. For this, the world needs to put more land down to farming staple commodities, and put less emphasis on consuming luxuries, such as meat and milk.

 

The days when the rich countries of the United States and Europe were fighting to take land out of agricultural production are gone. Remember the butter and wheat mountains in the United States and the wine lake in Europe? No more. Just in the United States, dairy products are rising in price, wheat reserves are being depleted and corn is in short supply because it is being diverted to ethanol production.

 

In 1943, the Rockefeller Foundation began funding a project to improve agricultural production in Mexico, in order to stave off a collapse of that country. Norman Borlaug, the Mexican Agriculture Project's chief scientist, has come to be regarded as the “father of the Green Revolution.”

 

The principles established in the foundation's project changed the agricultural production landscape of the world. India, with its enormous population, went from being a net importer of grain to an exporter. Also Indonesia, Japan and the Philippines improved their food lots, moving from precarious supply to reliable availability.

 

Countries that had suffered food deprivation during World War II, notably Britain and Japan, endeavored to maintain domestic food security through tariffs and subsidy, but gradually these fell to globalization. The United States has gradually hived off its production of many fruits and vegetables to external suppliers. Now, Chinese and Indian middle-class tables are competing with American households for these foods.

 

Interestingly, there was a Green Revolution that took place centuries before the one in the 1940s: The Islamic Green Revolution between the 8th and 13th Centuries. In that 500-year period, Muslim traders brought crops, such as sorghum from Africa, to the Middle East and Europe. And they opened the storehouses of crops from India, introducing into their sphere of influence citrus, mangoes and cotton.

 

The world can feed its population of 6.7 billion, but not without a revolution in land use. Like so much else, land use is highly political: Free-marketers push for its highest cash value. Meanwhile, we can look forward to possible food riots in many countries, including Bangladesh, Indonesia and Pakistan. People who have nothing to lose will take their hunger to the streets.

 

© 2008 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.

 

Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.

 

To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it.

 

This is Column # LK040.  Request permission to publish here.

Op-Ed Writers
Eric Baerren
Lucia de Vernai
Herman Cain
Dan Calabrese
Alan Hurwitz
Paul Ibrahim
David Karki
 
Llewellyn King
Gregory D. Lee
David B. Livingstone
Nathaniel Shockey
Stephen Silver
Candace Talmadge
Jamie Weinstein
Feature Writers
Mike Ball
Bob Batz
The Laughing Chef
David J. Pollay
Business Writers
Cindy Droog
D.F. Krause