Jamie
Weinstein
Read Jamie's bio and previous columns
April 7, 2008
If We Must Have Czars,
Lets Have These Czars
Hillary Clinton pledged last week that as president she would help end
"poverty as we know it in America" by appointing a cabinet level
"Poverty Czar." Ending poverty is a noble goal, but what I am most
concerned about is how the term "czar" made it into our political
lexicon?
We
have other czars currently in the White House. There is the Drug Czar
and most recently President Bush appointed the War Czar. Usually, czars
are appointed to solve, or help monitor, nagging policy problems that
just seem to fester. In reality, presidents don't really want a czar,
they want a wizard. Wizards can make problems go away with a puff of
smoke. Czars never seem to.
It
is somewhat baffling how we have settled on the term czar for these
types of positions, and nowhere is it more strangely used than with the
term poverty before it. It's like having a poverty king, which is almost
but not quite oxymoronic.
I'm not an expert on Russian history, but I don't remember many of the
czars I learned about being particularly favorable figures. Sure there
were the Greats, like Peter and Catherine. But for every Pete and Cathy,
there was an Ivan the Terrible who subjugated the populace to great
horrors. Perhaps a president could appoint a Czar Czar whose task would
be coming up with a different term we can use for these presidential
posts.
The habit of using the term czar, though, is not limited to Russian
history and the White House. Harvard University, for example, famously
now appoints a Fun Czar to try to enhance undergraduate life at the
storied school. I doubt that their results have been any better than
that of our many Drug Czars.
No
matter how odd it is to use this term, there is probably no fighting it.
So, as the saying goes, if you can't beat them, join them. In fact, I
would like to see a few new czars myself.
John McCain may be wise to appoint an Age Czar as president. This czar's
work would hit close to home for the aged McCain. Ideally, our Age Czar
should be at least as old as McCain himself so that this gray-haired
bureaucrat would actually have an incentive to accomplish the mission.
The mission? Find the Fountain of Youth.
A
Comedy Czar wouldn't be a bad idea for any president. Sometimes we as
Americans are just too serious. If you have the terrorist threat blues
or mortgage woes have you in a slump, the Comedy Czar would be there to
liven up your day. Right before the president is about to give a
landmark address about some depressing national issue, Comedy Czar Jerry
Seinfeld could warm up the American people before the big speech. Just
as the press is ready to zing hardballs at the president at an impending
presidential press conference, Comedy Czar Pee Wee Herman may be able to
take some wind out of their sails with a few well-placed jokes.
I
would say that Hillary Clinton could appoint a Love Czar, but that is
already the unofficial position of her husband Bill. In his official
capacity, Love Czar Bill could travel the world in search of love and
report on his findings to Congress. I am seeing a VH1 reality show in
the vein of Flavor of Love come out of this somehow.
Hillary Clinton probably wouldn't like it, but the American people would
benefit from a Truth Czar if she became president. This czar could point
out all Hillary's exaggerations and outright lies her campaign to date
has been filled with. I don't know who a good candidate would be, but
she should probably stay away from picking someone like Saddam Hussein's
old press secretary Baghdad Bob. He just doesn't have much credibility
these days.
Barack Obama could appoint a Racism Czar. Or perhaps, he could call it a
Hate Czar. There are two routes that this position could take.
In
one incarnation, the Hate Czar could be an actual racist. Say, David
Duke or perhaps Barack Obama's Pastor Jeremiah Wright. The Hate Czar
would pepper us every now and then with a racist speech or off-the-cuff
remark. President Obama could then point out to the American people
exactly why the comment was racist. I suppose, at least according to the
candidate, Obama's grandmother would qualify for this post as well.
Alternatively, the Hate Czar could roam America trying to get at the
root of racism. When Don Imus opens his mouth with another off-color
jibe, the Race Czar could lead the charge to remove the offender from
his job. I see only one possible candidate for this job: Al Sharpton. He
has the experience.
The goal of the Hate Czar, of course, would be the eradication of
racism. This is a worthy goal, but I bet some of you are thinking it is
probably an unachievable one as well. May I remind you that we are
talking about a Barack Obama Administration? He can do anything. Yes he
can.
Like it or not, czars will be with us for the long run, I think. Don't
worry, though. Unlike the wicked czars of Russia's past, ours czars
usually turn out to be largely inconsequential.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is column #
JW005.
Request permission to publish here. |