Read Eric's bio and previous columns
February 4, 2008
Poverty, the Stimulus
Package and the ĎLucky Duckiesí
A few months ago, a number of conservative journals touted
a study that ďprovedĒ that systemic poverty in the United States was a
thing of the past.
Naturally, the thing was
based on numbers, and not actual people. It was also only made possible
because the term poverty has largely vanished from our political
The word has disappeared,
owing greatly to how poverty is covered by the nationís media, but the
problem remains. Itís compounded by the fact that the people affected by
it, since they canít contribute to political campaigns, are easy to
Our current presidentís
solution to the problem is the same as his solution on most things Ė
shluffing the problem off onto someone elseís shoulders.
This was the point of his
faith-based programs. On top of providing access to federal dollars to
private organizations free to preach and practice discrimination, it
also represented failure by government of the people and for the people
to serve the people.
The result is the
economic stimulus package now in the Senate that would give tax money to
people. For many of these people, itís more money than what they might
expect to pay in federal income taxes. A redistribution of wealth,
certainly, but the kind that reminds us that a healthy economy is one in
which money flows, rather than stagnates in a few choice hands.
It goes without saying
that the package, even if it ultimately fails in the Senate, is a
repudiation of what today passes as the free-market movement. If the
market were so good about making money flow, then why does tax money
need to be given to people to stimulate the economy? The free market is
good at making people wealthy, but when they refuse to let money
circulate Ė literally share the wealth Ė itís to the poor economic
health of the nation at large.
The reason for that is
obvious. The poorer you are, the higher a percentage of your money is
spent on food, clothing and medicine. This, in turn, stimulates demand
for those things. You can do much with facts, figures and statistics,
but you canít mask the spending habits of the impoverished. Their
spending keeps money flowing and stimulates demands.
A few years back, the
Wall Street Journal called the nationís impoverished ďlucky duckiesĒ
because they donít have to pay federal income taxes. Itís nice to be in
a position from which itís possible to opine that paying federal income
taxes is somehow worse than struggling to make ends meet. It says much
about the Wall Street Journal editorial board members, and those
who subscribe to that philosophy.
On the other hand, those
who receive the tax rebate will put the money to better use in our
economy than letting it collect in offshore, non-taxable accounts,
invested overseas, or used to fund vacations to exotic foreign lands. It
will go to buy things, which in turn stimulates demand.
The tax rebate isnít
designed to assist the impoverished, but to prevent a recession. Giving
someone a couple hundred bucks isnít going to lift anyone from a state
of permanent poverty. At this time of year, in fact, many of those who
receive the checks will probably use them to pay for winter heating
bills, and there is reportedly strong sentiment on Capitol Hill that
strengthening unemployment benefits would do more good for the economy
than giving people checks.
Anyway, most of those who
receive the checks donít actually live in poverty. What ties this
program to the issue of poverty is resistance to it because the money
will go to ďlucky duckiesĒ who donít pay federal income taxes at all.
That let the cat out of
the bag. If itís wrong to give tax money in excess of whatís paid to
people, then itís worth taking a long look at how those people live and
whatís to be done about it.
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
This is column #
Request permission to publish here.