David
Karki
Read David's bio and previous columns here
August 4, 2008
Drilling is a Veto
Away for the Grand Oil Party
"There are
things you can do individually, though, to save energy. Making sure your
tires are properly inflated simple thing. But could we save all the
oil that theyre talking about getting off drilling if everybody was
just inflating their tires? And getting regular tune-ups? Youd actually
save just as much!" Sen. Barack
Obama, July 30, 2008
With the above, Obama
shows just how utterly disconnected from reality and living in his own
imaginary far left-wing world he is. First of all, you can never
conserve your way out of a shortage. What is it about the simple phrase
get more that he can't understand? Second, the U.S. currently consumes
20 million barrels of oil per day, and in a great many things other than
motorized vehicles. All the tire and engine checks in the world wouldn't
begin to make a dent in that.
Last, the Green River
Formation in Colorado and Utah holds roughly 800 billion barrels of
recoverable oil from shale. That alone is enough to last 100 years, and
that's but one location. Off-shore ocean drilling, ANWR, the list of
domestic places holding tons of oil goes on. In truth, there is no
shortage at all.
The only reason we have
an artificial shortage resulting in $4-plus-per-gallon gas is that
America's energy policy and thus her economic well-being and national
security is being held hostage by the radical environmentalist lobby,
through their Democratic puppets in Congress. They're determined to
permanently remake this nation in their twisted Marxist image by
forcibly eliminating automobiles through denial of the energy that
powers them.
Get rid of the car, and
the suburban lifestyle is by definition unsustainable. This applies to
home heating and cooling even more. Why climate-control all those
suburban single-family homes when one inner-city high-rise can be so
handled for so much less? With ultra-expensive energy, people will have
to migrate back into cities, and thus under liberal government control.
Think about it who
chooses where and when the mass transit runs? Hint: It's not you.
But own a car, and you choose as you see fit. Who chooses the lifestyle
policies for the apartment building? Hint: It's not you. But own
a house and you can blast music or smoke if you like because it won't
affect anyone else.
This fundamental shift
of power explains why Democrats are taking what would otherwise be a
politically inexplicable position. This isn't about energy for them
it's about their best shot at laying the foundation for totalitarianism.
Get people to accept $4 or $5 or $6 a gallon gas as an unchangeable way
of life, and they'll willingly accept many of these intrusions on
personal liberty and standards of living.
Which brings us to the
question of what can be done to stop this and allow the American people
access to their own natural resources. There is perhaps one way to force
the issue, if Republicans can find their long-lost courage and decide to
go all-in with the hand they have, which is better than they think it
is.
The Democrats haven't
come close to passing a budget, determined as they are to stall until
Obama is sworn in to pass what they really want. Thus, they need to pass
a continuing resolution to fund the federal government past September 30
and avoid a shutdown in the heart of campaign season. The ban on issuing
domestic drilling leases is typically renewed therein. (It expires
annually, and is really a ban on allowing access to the land, not on
drilling itself.) As President Bush has rescinded the concomitant
Executive Order, Democratic renewal of the ban is the only thing
preventing drilling.
If the GOP can grow a
spine, they could either filibuster the ban-containing resolution (which
the Democrats likely don't have the required 60 votes to prevent), or
better yet, President Bush could veto it and GOP senators could uphold
it (for which they would have the 34 votes needed). Then the Democrats
would be forced to explain why they would be willing to shut the
government down solely to stop drilling.
This is a high-stakes
gamble, and it would need to be well-coordinated. The Democrats will
scream bloody murder and a biased media will spew their talking points.
But the GOP can calmly answer all of this, truthfully painting the
Democrats as controlled by the radical greenies, and willing to screw
the masses in order to serve them. At the same time, the GOP is on the
side of the masses, willing to do whatever it takes to finally access
America's plentiful energy supplies for them. It might just restore the
GOP brand to some level of respect and kick-start it out of the rut in
which it otherwise languishes.
And that's the fly in
the ointment. The GOP has so hurt its own credibility that even
something as out-of-character for them as this won't convince a lot of
folks. Doubly bad, their own ostensible standard-bearer in Sen. John
McCain could very well be on the wrong side of the issue even more
cognitive dissonance.
But I honestly can't
see where there is anything left to lose. President Bush is leaving in
six months, the GOP brand-name is at its nadir, and if you can't go
after a Democratic leadership when it has a whopping 9 percent approval
rating, when can you ever do it?
The Democrats are
already painting Republicans as the Grand Oil Party. I would take that
and turn it on them. Just as the Founders staged the Boston Tea Party to
protest a two-cent tax, we can stage the American Oil Party to tell
Democrats what we think of their intransigence. And hopefully, it won't
take a subsequent six-year-long war for independence to drive out some
modern day King George IIIs.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # DKK134.
Request
permission to publish here. |