David
Karki
Read David's bio and previous columns here
April 28, 2008
Conservatives'
Unease With McCain
In the space of one
day, Sen. John McCain put on clear display for all to see the reason why
so many conservatives are so unhappy with his candidacy, and why most of
them will vote against the Democratic nominee rather than for
McCain, presuming they can find it in themselves to pull that lever at
all.
McCain first
disingenuously criticized the Bush Administration's response to
Hurricane Katrina, in so doing cementing the liberal shibboleths that
have come to be the “truth” on the subject. Not once did he mention the
dereliction of Mayor Ray Nagin and Gov. Kathleen Blanco, or that
President Bush was stymied by the latter in hurried attempts to get at
least some personnel and supplies staged in Louisiana before Katrina
made landfall.
Nor did he use that as
an object lesson in why people should never depend on government. Nor
did he even qualify his remarks with something indicating that with all
the entourage a president must bring, staying out of the way might be
the best way to help. (And that the Democrats almost certainly, if
hypocritically, would have accused Bush of grandstanding and exploiting
the tragedy had he visited.)
Given a chance to
demonstrate some conservative bonafides and to break down a little of
the myth around the Katrina post-mortem, McCain instead pandered to the
worst liberal talking points.
He followed that
display by criticizing a perfectly legitimate ad produced by the North
Carolina GOP in advance of that state’s primary on May 6. The ad shows a
photo of Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Sen. Barack Obama, plays a clip of
Wright's incendiary rhetoric and the narrator says “He's just too
extreme for North Carolina.”
This is not exactly
Willie Horton here, but that didn't stop McCain from insisting that the
North Carolina GOP not air it and saying they were “out of touch with
reality and the Republican Party.” As if he should be the one to decide
what can and can't air. (Then again, he does have a history of trashing
the First Amendment with McCain-Feingold, so it's not that surprising.)
If anyone is out of touch here, it's McCain with the conservative
rank-and-file.
And if the ad is so
out-of-bounds, how are Wright and Obama themselves not? The ad is only
telling the truth – playing Wright's own remarks and reminding voters of
Obama's long association with him. The “outraged” response is, I think,
simply because someone got too close to the truth for comfort. As
Shakespeare said, methinks thou doth protest too much.
That McCain would
actually go so far as to demand the ad be yanked and then insult its
prodcuers is, on its face, inexplicable. The only plausible strategic
reason, given by Jim Geraghty at NR's Campaign Spot amongst others, is
that he knew his demand would be rejected, so he gets to look sensitive
while simultaneously bringing national attention to the ad, the larger
and longer hashing of which might keep it in the news and hurt his
potential opponent this fall.
This might be
believable if it were the first time, but McCain's track record makes
this hard to take at face value. Perhaps if he hadn't spent most of the
last decade happily moving left, I could more readily accept that this
was a standard political shrewd move and not just pre-emptive surrender.
With moves like these
two during this campaign, after years of sticking it to conservatives
every way possible –you name the big awful liberal bill and he
co-sponsored it – it shouldn't be shocking that conservatives have major
misgivings about McCain. Nor that he and the GOP have found raising
funds and volunteers difficult. You can't expect folks who have been
betrayed and who continue to be treated poorly to be eager to give their
money and time to those perpetrating the betrayal and mistreatment.
McCain is going out of
his way to eschew and disdain the very people who ought to be his base.
Whether this is out of over-eagerness to win over whichever subset of
Democrats will inevitably be unhappy with their nominee, or out of sheer
arrogance over the fact that conservatives have nowhere else to go, I do
not know. And it doesn't really matter.
McCain is on the verge
of losing conservatives altogether. Yes, Obama and Hillary Clinton are
equally awful choices from our point of view. The argument that at least
he's better than those two necessarily disappears when he's not
substantively different from them.
In an election year
where our choices consist of a liberal senator, a very liberal senator
and the most liberal senator of all, the easiest way for McCain to stand
out and to keep his right flank from leaking – if not hemorrhaging – is
to say and do things that reassure conservatives he hasn't become the
complete creature of the Beltway that, by all indications, it seems he
has.
McCain is right to
reach across the aisle. The problem is that it's not back to
conservatives from the liberal position he now firmly holds. And his
failure to do so stands to be fatal to his campaign.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # DKK117.
Request
permission to publish here. |