David
Karki
Read David's bio and previous columns here
April 21, 2008
Energy Policy:
Drill, Baby, Drill . . . Or Get Ready For Hell
Crude oil hit $114 a
barrel this weekend. Gas prices are pushing $4 a gallon, and could well
hit $5 by the time Memorial Day and summer driving season arrives. At
what point will we finally restore sanity to our national energy policy?
Or even have a policy, for that matter?
How much longer will we
go on, refusing to acquire the plentiful energy resources under our own
land and waters and then sending mountains of money to people who would
celebrate our destruction? And on top of that, indulging the
liberty-crushing, economy-wrecking pipe dreams of the radical
environmentalist crowd in response to a “crisis” that's entirely
non-existent?
Sadly, it seems
everyone inside the Beltway has gotten knee-walking drunk from the green
Kool-Aid chug-a-lug. Even President Bush has come out with a bill to cut
greenhouse gas emissions by 2025, if only to stave off a far worse bill
authored by Senators Joe Lieberman and John Warner. Never mind that they
haven't the slightest idea how to make their absurd requirements become
reality. Apparently, they'll just wave the magic wand of government, and
poof! We'll just not emit carbon without any reduction in living
standards. This is breathtaking hubris, even by the pathetically low
standard of U.S. senators.
The only way to get
where they would force us to go is to simply deny energy to the
citizenry. Sen. Barack Obama has already indicated as much in a recent
primary debate, saying that the only way to lower prices is to lower
demand. In other words, he'll be a Seinfeldian Energy Nazi: “No energy
for you!” (I wonder, is he going to station troops at gas stations and
electrical meters on people's homes to ensure no one consumes too much?
Just how totalitarian and dictatorial would the enforcement mechanisms
have to be?) Liberals believe in “energy independence” all right –
independence from energy by not having any.
No technology currently
exists to take the place of oil in any substantial way, and if it did it
wouldn't need huge government subsidies to prop it up. What's more, we
have plenty of oil in ANWR (enough to import none from Saudi Arabia for
20 years), in North Dakota, in the Gulf of Mexico (which Cuba is
drilling with China's help, but we won't) and off the Pacific coast.
Natural gas, too.
Anyone with an ounce of
common sense would realize that, to be energy independent and able to
handle inevitable periodic supply disruptions – be that due to
hurricanes or hostile vendors – we need to have much more domestic stock
and the refinery infrastructure to handle it. And if we're going to have
any significant portion of the car fleet go electric, we'll need
numerous new power plants to provide that electricity.
Instead, we have
supplies so short and refinery infrastructure so crimped that even
worthless environmental regulations requiring winter and summer boutique
gasoline blends – which force refineries offline each spring to change
over – are enough to cause price spikes. And we have outright bans on
any new refinery or nuclear power plant construction, so aging older
(and dirtier by comparison) coal-fired plants have to keep running. This
in a nation that will add another 63 million people worth of energy
demand by 2030, and a world where 2.4 billion Chinese and Indians want
to stay warm in the winter and drive cars just as much as anyone.
A sensible policy would
expedite the accessing of all available domestic supplies of oil and
natural gas, build sufficient refinery capacity to withstand any
disruption, repeal both the federal gas tax (it only funds pork
spending; let states maintain the roads within their respective borders
and all of us save 18.4 cents a gallon) and frivolous regulations that
only add expense to production while doing nothing for the environment.
Then with that new leverage, the oligopoly of OPEC would be forced to
cut prices to keep us as customers in some capacity.
And get rid of all
ethanol subsidies and mandates, which only act as a food tax that goes
for an inefficient boondoggle that would take far more arable land and
water to produce than we can possibly spare. (Again, if ethanol can
work, it doesn't need the crutch of government.) Nothing is more stupid
than a nation tearing up its food supply for a frivolous energy source
while vast amounts of the tried-and-true remain untapped and ready to
use.
As for electricity,
build lots of new nuclear power plants to replace older coal and gas
fired ones, as well as to handle supplying the increasing demand that
electric cars will inevitably bring. Nuclear power is safe and clean.
Even the French get 70-plus percent of their power from nuclear. What
little waste is produced can be shot into outer space if people are too
irrationally freaked out to have it buried at Yucca Mountain or some
such equivalent. (Space being, after all, full of billions of nuclear
furnaces called stars.)
We cannot continue down
this pie-in-the-sky primrose path, and expect that there will not be
severe negative consequences that affect us all for having allowed the
radical, blind-to-reality global warming cultists to create policy for a
world that only exists in their far-left totalitarian fantasies. At some
point we have to demolish the barriers they have created and reclaim
what is rightfully ours – and more importantly, what keeps us a free and
prosperous people – before it's too late.
If we do not grow a
spine and go to war against the radical greenies, we will not be able to
recognize our civilization much longer. Sky-high food prices, no energy
and no liberty at all – not even to choose what kind of light bulb to
put in your lamps. Welcome to enviro-wacko utopia, or, as the rest of us
call it, Hell.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # DKK115.
Request
permission to publish here. |