March 5,
2007
You Want
to Join the Union, Don’t You?
Did you
know that voting via secret ballot violates your free choice?
Neither
did I, but apparently free choice is only worth protecting if you intend
to make the choice that union organizers want you to make. Congressional
Democrats have embarked upon a fruitless but instructive quest to
subject American workers to intimidation – all in the name of ending
intimidation, of course.
Since
1947, the National Labor Relations Act has allowed for a secret ballot
when employees are in the midst of a union organizing effort. The
provision is designed to protect employees against intimidation from
either side – management or union bosses. And secret ballots are a
quintessential democratic tradition. You vote as you wish, with no
reprisals.
But with
union membership down to 12 percent of the entire work force – and only
7.5 percent of the private sector workforce – union bosses want
something done. Bring back reprisals! But only the kind they like.
In a
near party-line vote, Democrats in the House passed a bill that would
eliminate the right to a secret ballot in a union organizing effort.
Union organizers would simply have to persuade a majority of workers in
a given shop to sign union organizing cards, and presto! The union is
certified.
California Democrat George Miller lauded the bill as if it were the
salvation of America’s blue collar workforce, declaring triumphantly
that with this bill, “If a majority of workers say they want a union,
they get a union!”
Actually, if they sign a card someone pre-wrote for them saying they
want a union, they get a union foisted upon them. The history of union
organizing is replete with intimidation. To be sure, some employers have
been just as intimidating in their efforts to keep unions out. That’s
why the law provides for secret ballots.
Yet in
this go-round, it is only the unions who are objecting to secret
ballots. They claim that in the run-up to union organizing elections,
companies are intimidating workers by giving them what is termed as
anti-union propaganda. In other words, the other side of the story.
Hmm.
What could the companies be telling them? Maybe they’re telling them
about the obscene percentage of union dues that go to support political
candidates and causes that may not be favored by a given employee.
That’s instead of union dues going to support the workers.
Maybe
they’re telling them about how union-saturated industries, particularly
the automotive industry, are collapsing under the costs incurred as a
result of management decisions to buy labor peace over the course of
many years.
Maybe
they explain the archaic work rules imposed under union contracts,
knowing that such rules are not going to be appealing to a
self-motivated individual who is serious about excellent performance.
If the
unions are serious in making this argument, they are actually admitting
that they can’t win a campaign. If both parties have a chance to make
their case, management usually wins, which is why union membership
continues to drop.
If, on
the other hand, they simply want to be able to lean on people a little
harder to sign those cards – and these blasted secret ballots make it so
hard to put the muscle to a guy, you know? – it takes some chutzpah for
them to claim they seek this because they are concerned about
intimidation.
Fortunately, workers’ right to their own free choice on union organizing
matters is not in immediate danger. In the unlikely event the bill ever
comes out of the Senate, President Bush will veto it. There are not
enough votes in favor to override the veto.
But
House and Senate Democrats have left no doubt who runs the show. They
still rely heavily on unions for financial support, and unions need more
members paying compulsory dues if they are going to continue to fund
Democrats. A growing number of American workers don’t want to pay
compulsory dues to unions, so it only makes sense that their free choice
not to join unions needs to be taken away.
Democrats must really be feeling their oats to actually try this in such
shameless fashion. Their mid-term election win has them on top of the
world. But it’s easy to be popular when you have no power. It’s been
awhile since Americans saw what Democrats actually do with power. We’ll
see how Americans react to reminders like this one.
© 2007 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.