Gregory D.
Lee
Read Greg's bio and previous columns here
July 14, 2008
Cut Off Federal Funds
to ‘Sanctuary Cities’ Like San Francisco
Just about the time you thought extreme liberals couldn’t get any more
screwy or out of touch with reality than they already are, along comes
another example that tops the last one you heard.
It
turns out that up until last month, San Francisco’s Juvenile Probation
Department had been transporting illegal alien juvenile drug dealers to
their home countries to avoid their being arrested and deported by the
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. Once that practice
stopped, the city then began to transport these felons south to a group
home in San Bernardino County, California, much to the surprise of local
authorities there. The last batch of illegals San Francisco sent
consisted of eight Honduran juvenile drug dealers who ended up escaping
from custody and are now probably on their way to another sanctuary
city, like New Haven, Connecticut, that will also protect them from
federal prosecution and deportation.
It
seems the good folks of San Francisco didn’t want their crack cocaine
suppliers prosecuted, let alone deported, so they moved them around the
state so ICE could not arrest and deport them to their native countries.
The San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department cited the city’s
“sanctuary city ordinance” as its excuse for obstructing justice and
harboring federal fugitives. The 1989 city ordinance titled, “City of
Refuge,” prohibits city employees from informing ICE agents of illegal
immigrants. I suppose the “diversity” of the city would radically change
if all its illegals were suddenly deported.
All of this comes on the heels of San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom’s
announcement that he is exploring a run for governor. Now, through a
spokesman, the wannabe governor wants everyone to know that San
Francisco’s sanctuary ordinance “provides no protection for those who
are felony suspects,” and “The mayor refuses to allow San Francisco to
be a sanctuary for drug dealers.”
Oh? He could have fooled me. The last time I checked, sale of crack
cocaine was a felony, even in San Francisco. The mayor obviously does
knowingly allow the city to be a sanctuary for drug dealers. Why else
would the city’s Juvenile Probation Department hide these fugitives from
the feds unless it wanted to provide a sanctuary security blanket that
extended hundreds of miles beyond the city limits all the way to San
Bernardino County?
Until recently, the Juvenile Probation Department used city funds to
transport the young felons to their native countries to avoid any
contact whatsoever with ICE. The sanctuary San Francisco provided these
illegal aliens is nothing less than the harboring of fugitives and the
facilitation of other federal crimes.
As
further evidence, Mayor Newsom recently criticized the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) for its tactics to “undermine” the use of marijuana
by patients authorized under state law to use the illegal drug for
medicinal purposes. He has asked the mother of San Francisco values,
Nancy Pelosi, to conduct congressional hearings on the matter. The mayor
sounds like a real advocate for a drug-free city. First he attacks the
DEA and then hides drug dealers from deportation.
All of this illustrates why sanctuary cities like San Francisco need to
be punished for what they have done, and other cities need to be
discouraged from providing sanctuary to illegal aliens.
Congress needs to cut off not some, but all federal funding to
San Francisco and other cities that have declared themselves sanctuary
cities. This funding includes supplements for education, roadways,
transportation projects, etc. The cut-off of these funds will suddenly
make these cities believers that there is no benefit to be gained from
undermining the federal effort to root out illegal aliens who are here
to take jobs from Americans, or sell drugs, such as in San Francisco’s
case.
Congress also needs to deputize state and local police officers so they
can enforce federal immigration law, or at least question persons about
their immigration status so they can be turned over to ICE for
processing.
Most of all, the country needs sanctuary from cities like San Francisco,
Santa Ana, California, New York City, New Haven, Connecticut and others
that, for political posturing, throw roadblocks in front of the federal
government’s efforts to enforce immigration law. So long as these cities
direct their police departments and employees not to cooperate with ICE,
they will continue to be safe havens for illegal aliens who are here to
exploit this country’s generosity and limited resources.
Gregory D. Lee is a
nationally syndicated columnist and criminal justice consultant. He can
be reached through his website: www.gregorydlee.com.
© 2008 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # GL029. Request permission to publish here. |