ABOUT US  • COLUMNISTS   NEWS/EVENTS  FORUM ORDER FORM RATES MANAGEMENT CONTACT

Nathaniel

Shockey

 

 

Read Nathaniel's bio and previous columns here

 

November 26, 2007

My Manhood’s On the Line, But I Love ‘Dancing With the Stars’

 

I’ve been meaning to write about ABC’s “Dancing With the Stars” for a while, but embarrassment and inflated notions of manhood have discouraged me up until now. So what changed? I’m not sure, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

 

Of course, any guy can fake his way through an excuse for watching the show by referencing the skimpy outfits the girls tend to wear. Hell, even the show uses that angle in its commercials. But I guess I might as well just refute that sad excuse for watching right here and now.

 

The costumes the girls wear are much more bizarre than they are scandalous. If Nicole Kidman was caught sporting anything the girls from DWTS wear, within minutes she’d be ripped to shreds on every celebrity gossip show, website and magazine for wearing the ugliest outfit since Bjork wore poultry at the 2001 Oscars. Even Tom Bergeron, the show’s host, said Jennie Garth looked like the Jolly Green Giant at one point. DWTS takes generally attractive men and women and makes them look ridiculous. Sorry, men. I didn’t mean to ruin it for you. Maybe later we can drink some beer and watch “300”. (Seriously, my wife just got me that movie as an early Christmas present. I’m so excited – I mean pumped!)

 

And speaking of Tom Bergeron, he has got to be the best host on TV right now, live or edited. I realize I’m not the first one to sing his praises, but it’s absolutely true. He manages to be funny yet inoffensive, edgy yet politically correct, and through all this, he remains accessible to the average viewer. He can take the most awkward situation and turn it into an opportunity to mindlessly shovel another handful of popcorn into your mouth.

 

One of the things that drives me nuts about “American Idol” is that it’s a popularity contest instead of a singing competition. The winners are determined completely by the votes of the viewers. The winners of DWTS, on the other hand, are at least partially determined by the judges’ scores. And for that matter, I think the judges are pretty legit. The fact that I have actually never heard of some of the dancing terms they use is, at least for me, reassuring. I tend to trust their opinions more than my own, which is how it’s supposed to be when purported “professionals” judge a form of art. For a culture in which the line between that which sells and that which is actually good is so incredibly ambiguous, a willingness to make the distinction is extremely refreshing.

 

And now for the hardest thing to admit as a self-respecting, 21st Century American male – here goes – maybe the best part of “Dancing With the Stars” is the dancing part.

 

The romantic “dance like no one is watching” notion is really celebrated on this show. There’s something purer and more exhilarating about the Latin and Ballroom dances you see every Monday night than the flashy, and perhaps even arrogant styles that are quickly becoming the face of popular dancing in America. Art is a wonderful way to express human emotion, and the range and honesty of emotion expressed by so many of the dancers on DWTS can be truly moving. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that all the stars on the show seem like such nice people. It’s almost as if the art of dancing brings the joy out of them.

 

Of course, the show is not without its gimmicks. For example, there really is no need for an hour-long results show every week. And a DWTS tour? Yeah, there will be one of those, too. But obviously, any network worth its salt is going to milk a winning formula for all it’s worth. Television is one baby that simply requires bathwater.

 

“Dancing With the Stars” has so many things going for it that we could very well be watching this show for decades, which is okay by me. And for all the closet DWTS fans at home confused by the bizarre harmony discovered between ballroom dancing and testosterone, feel free to join me every Tuesday night after the show to watch “300” – you know, just in case you’re still confused about your manhood.

 

© 2007 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.

 

Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.

 

To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it.

This is Column # NS084. Request permission to publish here.

Op-Ed Writers
Eric Baerren
Lucia de Vernai
Herman Cain
Dan Calabrese
Alan Hurwitz
Paul Ibrahim
David Karki
 
Llewellyn King
Gregory D. Lee
David B. Livingstone
Nathaniel Shockey
Stephen Silver
Candace Talmadge
Jamie Weinstein
Feature Writers
Mike Ball
Bob Batz
David J. Pollay
 
Eats & Entertainment
The Laughing Chef