ABOUT US  • COLUMNISTS   NEWS/EVENTS  FORUM ORDER FORM RATES MANAGEMENT CONTACT

Nathaniel

Shockey

 

 

Read Nathaniel's bio and previous columns here

 

October 8, 2007

The Arbitrary Nature of Humanity

 

In one particular strip of my favorite comic, Calvin and Hobbes, Calvin lets go of a helium-filled balloon and says, “Gravity is arbitrary.”

 

Arbitrary is a great word. It’s awkward to pronounce, which is what I like about it. You won’t happen upon too many amateur English-speakers who can say it correctly – too many “r”s.

 

The word “arbitrary” comes from the Latin word “arbiter”, which means “one who goes somewhere as a witness or judge.” Actually, the earliest English form of the word is “arbitress,” which meant a woman who settles disputes. I think this is incredibly interesting, considering the way women were viewed in the 14th century – highly emotional and irrational.

 

If you take this view of women (degenerate as it may be) and plug it into the concept of “a woman who settles disputes,” I think that may be the best explanation for how we arrived at our current definition of arbitrary.

 

Despite having the same root, “arbitrary” has strayed considerably from the term “arbiter.” For example, I can think of no better example for the modern definition of arbitrary than a baseball umpire. An umpire’s ruling of balls and strikes is never, ever the same. Throw the exact same pitch two times in a row and it is very possible to get a ball and a strike. And oddly, if you throw the same pitch six inches outside the strike zone enough times, the umpire begins to call it a strike. They try to be consistent, to govern justly, but sometimes the judgments are nearly impossible to make with certainty. This really sucks sometimes, because one pitch can very easily determine the outcome of the game. Balls and strikes are arbitrary.

 

Some police officers will give you a ticket for driving 70 in a 55. Others won’t. And to make matters even more asinine, the same officer might give you a ticket one day for doing 75 in a 65 and let you go the next. The whole situation is incredibly frustrating because you never really know how much you can push it before you’re in danger of getting robbed of $100 and 20 minutes of your life. Speeding tickets are arbitrary.

 

Although most of us make arbitrary judgments on an hourly basis, what we all long for is something consistent. What everyone fears is an inconsistent Supreme Court Justice – an arbitrary arbiter. Granted, we all have our biases and interpretations of what is just or unjust, constitutional or unconstitutional, but what we really want is someone who will know and understand the U.S. Constitution and judge accordingly.

 

We wish the same idea for our leaders. We want to elect people who will be consistently objective – ruling based on reason and history. We don’t need any more opportunists, following the way that seems most popular at the time, leading us God knows where as long as they finish their term without too tarnished a legacy. There is nothing more disappointing than electing someone who says they stand for one thing, only to see them eventually bend or break under pressure.

 

Unfortunately, although we’ve only ever voted for an arbiter, what we most often get is an arbitress.

 

But I think the truth of all this is that humans can only ever be arbitrary. Our minds are always changing, evolving, getting smarter, dumber or maybe just older. It isn’t really possible to find someone who always gets it right. The important thing is that we are always striving, and I think one of the most amazing human traits is the ability to begin so stupidly and yet grow to such impressive heights of reason and conviction. This is what people mean when they talk about character. It is having the courage and discipline to change.

 

Basketball, hockey, football and even tennis have all adopted the official review to ensure just officiating. They’ll stop a game for several minutes to use every possible camera angle to make sure they arrive at the correct call. But baseball hasn’t, and I’m not sure it ever will. In a way, I think baseball is incredibly wise. I think that as technology becomes increasingly involved, the game and its players begin to lose their natural instinct to evolve. But in baseball, the strike zone can get lower, it could get higher or smaller, and pitchers can continue to earn their strikes on the outside corners by pegging the same location enough times. The game is alive, just like everyone who loves to play it. Perhaps part of the beauty of baseball lies in its inherently arbitrary nature.

 

In a way, there is something beautiful about people and their arbitrary nature, the way we struggle to find consistency in lives full of uncertainty and change. We scrape and claw for the tiniest morsel of truth, even if all we ever find is helium balloons.

 

© 2007 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.

 

Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.

 

To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it.

This is Column # NS077. Request permission to publish here.

Op-Ed Writers
Eric Baerren
Lucia de Vernai
Herman Cain
Dan Calabrese
Alan Hurwitz
Paul Ibrahim
David Karki
 
Llewellyn King
Gregory D. Lee
David B. Livingstone
Nathaniel Shockey
Stephen Silver
Candace Talmadge
Jamie Weinstein
Feature Writers
Mike Ball
Bob Batz
David J. Pollay
 
Eats & Entertainment
The Laughing Chef