Llewellyn
King
Read Llewellyn's bio and previous columns
December 31, 2007
Belgium Faces the Limits of Its Democracy
BRUSSELS, Belgium – Democracy, Winston Churchill said, is the worst form
of government, except all those other forms that have been tried from
time to time. Churchill, of course, was talking about democracy in
Britain – a Britain that was homogeneous; a Britain that was divided
along class lines, not linguistic or religious lines. Enter these other
divisions, and the institutions of democracy have to be ever so
carefully contrived for the democracy to work.
Yes, I mean contrived. Switzerland has a contrived democracy to
accommodate its linguistic divisions. Before things fell apart, Lebanon
had a contrived democracy to accommodate its religious divisions.
And the United States has a contrived democracy to accommodate the
discrepancies of a continental-sized country. The strength of our
nation's legislative system is the disparity between the House and the
Senate. Through this division of power, the Senate is able to curb the
exuberance of the House. Politics in the House are raw and earthy; in
the Senate, they are refined and dignified.
If
little Belgium, with around 10 million people, is to hold together as a
cohesive nation, it needs a new contrivance in its political system.
Traditionally, Belgium has been where Latin and Germanic Europe met. It
was the fault line. Now the fault is threatening the country.
Briefly, these are the facts: Traditionally, the French-speaking
southern region of Wallonia has dominated the Dutch-speaking northern
region of Flanders. The French-speakers believe themselves to be
culturally superior to their Flemish-speaking fellow citizens. Also
traditionally, the French-speakers have enjoyed an economic edge. But
that has been changing since the middle of the 20th Century.
The French-speakers, now in a minority, are getting some of their own
medicine from the Dutch-speakers.
Today, Belgium is bitterly divided and almost ungovernable. Political
crisis is the norm, and it is only because of the high autonomy in both
linguistic groups that the country functions at all.
To
those of us on the outside, this is very sad. Belgium has been an
artistic powerhouse since before it was a formal country. It has a
wealth of qualities that make it an agreeable place to live. And it has
attracted international organizations nearly as effectively as has
Geneva, Switzerland. Brussels is the headquarters of the European Union,
and NATO is headquartered outside the city.
Yet things are getting uglier. They are uglier than when I first visited
Belgium more than 30 years ago, and palpably uglier than they were just
two years ago. My wife, who speaks French fluently, has learned in
recent visits to such delightful destinations as Bruges and Antwerp that
the Flemings would rather speak English than French. Not only do the
protagonists in this cultural battle bring an unpleasantness to daily
life, but they also threaten Belgium's stability and future. Chopping
the country in half does not quite work, because there are language
enclaves in the north and the south.
The answer is a better democratic model – one that can accommodate
permanent intransigence. If the Belgians come up with such a model, it
will be much in demand in such permanently divided countries as Nigeria,
Northern Ireland and, of course, Iraq.
The colonial powers, when they exited Africa, tended to leave behind
perfect little unicameral parliamentary democracies. They were all swept
away by thugs who won just one election.
The Founding Fathers, in their genius, realized that democracy was a lot
more than a simple popularity contest. Indeed they realized that
majorities, as much as minorities, need to be protected from themselves.
Permanently divided countries need a democratic contrivance that will
enable them to function.
The current fervor, in and out of the Bush administration, for spreading
democracy has concentrated on the simple act of voting. That is the easy
part. Getting a viable, respected structure is the hard part. Get it
right and greatness is possible. Get it wrong and the smaller price is a
standoff, as in Belgium, or the bigger price that is now being paid in
Pakistan.
© 2007 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # LK023.
Request permission to publish here. |