Llewellyn
King
Read Llewellyn's bio and previous columns
September 3, 2007
Tony Snow and the
Lightness of Being Conservative
The White House press corps can be surprisingly sentimental. Take the
case of Tony Snow, the departing press secretary. When Snow announced
the return of his cancer, dry eyes in the briefing room were few. The
ultra-conservative Snow has been much loved by the mostly liberal White
House media.
Why? First, Snow is one of us. He is a journalist, albeit more
commentator than reporter. Second, Snow is just a hugely likable man –
that has nothing to do with politics or journalism. That is just the
human dimension of the man.
Like many correspondents, I have known Snow for a long time. I first met
him when he was editorial page editor of The Washington Times – a
blithe spirit in a somber newspaper. This quality of being in some way
lighter than air is the essential core of Snow, it seems to me.
It has enabled him to float above controversy, and to be forgiven views
far out of the mainstream of even Washington conservative thought. That
is Snow in his writing and broadcasting – especially the latter, where
as a sit-in for Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly, Snow was more radically
conservative than such fixtures of the right as George Will and Charles
Krauthammer.
The public work of the press secretary takes place, when the president
is in Washington, twice a day at the “gaggle” and at the “briefing.” The
former is an on-the-record curtain-raiser for the day, usually held
around 9 am. The latter is the daily half-hour on-camera briefing that
has become a staple of C-SPAN.
The private work is counseling the president and the top echelon of his
administration on press strategy and the collective mood of the fourth
estate. The press secretary might advise a presidential press
conference, an exclusive interview with a network or a session with
editorial writers.
For the president to understand the media mirror, he and his press
secretary must have rapport. A merely correct and professional
relationship will not do the job. Mike McCurry, another popular press
secretary, was highly effective because he and President Clinton were
pals. I watched them joshing together on presidential trips and was
involved in an incident in which Clinton was embarrassed by something
McCurry told me on the record. McCurry said that Clinton did not
understand the media or the Congress. Tough stuff. When Tim Russert
challenged Clinton with these accusations on NBC's “Meet the Press,”
Clinton laughed them off. They had rapport. Snow has been a frequent
player in the Oval Office. He and President Bush have rapport.
Others have been much less successful. Most notably in recent years, Dee
Dee Myers for Clinton and Scott McClellan for Bush. Myers floundered and
McClellan was stiff and uncomfortable with the media, suggesting that
neither enjoyed the full confidence of their master nor an organic
understanding of the media.
One of the most successful relationships between spokesman and chief
executive was not in Washington but London. That was the relationship
between Margaret Thatcher and her spokesman, the irascible Bernard
Ingham. His reverence for Thatcher was tender as well as supportive. He
once told me, “I'm trying to get her to rest more.” Phew!
Clearly, Snow has been good for Bush in the dark days of his presidency.
Snow said he is leaving because he needs more money. This does not
convince. At $168,000 a year, Snow is paid more than most print
journalists in the press corps, and many broadcast correspondents. Snow
may have made very good money at Fox, and with his radio show, but he
knew the pay scale when he entered the White House. He clearly made less
when he was a speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush, and not much
at The Washington Times, which is known for the modesty of its
pay scale.
Is there something else at work? Has Snow wearied of defending policies
he has lost his faith in? Before signing up for the press secretary job,
Snow had been critical of the competence of the administration. Has that
been confirmed from within? It is a question worth asking.
But I think it is about money: Money, health and family. I believe that
despite Snow's public assurances that his cancer is at bay, he is
worried about the future of his young family. Not all of his arguments
have had unassailable merit. That one does. Good luck, blithe spirit.
© 2007 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # LK006.
Request permission to publish here. |