Llewellyn
King
Read Llewellyn's bio and previous columns
August 20, 2007
Argentina, and the
World, Grapple with the Economic Emergence of China
BUENOS AIRES – The government has increased import tariffs here on a
range of goods, in an effort to curb the flood of Chinese imports.
Predictably, the move by President Nestor Kirchner has been widely
popular with the Argentine business community, but has furrowed the
brows of international bankers and economists.
Popular solutions to economic problems are not unknown in Argentina.
Generally they have not worked, and sometimes they have led to financial
crisis. Nonetheless Kirchner, whose wife, Cristina Fernandez de
Kirchner, is hoping to succeed him in the presidency, has taken up arms
against China. His detractors say his move to increase import tariffs
will impair the country’s five-year growth spurt. No country has
recovered quicker or better from disaster than Argentina, which has been
able to maintain growth of 8 percent a year. But real growth is hampered
by inflation, and Kirchner’s protectionist move is predicted to kick up
inflation.
While economists may say that the Argentine response to floods of
Chinese goods will be counterproductive, more and more governments feel
that they must protect their economies from Chinese competition. This is
particularly true of countries, such as Argentina, where there are
traditional industries that are identified with their national cultures.
But this is not just a problem for Argentina and small economies. It is
a global challenge that is without precedent. The United States, for
example, has just realized that 85 percent of its toys are made in China
and 50 percent of its seafood is imported from there. This is a
staggering market capture – greater than Britain’s world trade dominance
in the 19th Century and America’s dominance through much of the last
century.
The Chinese phenomenon requires study and more sophisticated responses
than Kirchner’s tariffs. The simple answer to the Chinese success is
cheap labor. But cheap labor does not explain the encircling grip of the
Chinese Dragon. There is cheap labor aplenty in the Philippines,
Indonesia, Africa and Latin America.
Perhaps the answers lie in the culture and ethnicity of the Chinese. For
millennia they were introspective, passive and remote. None of those who
invaded China thought that it had much to offer, or that the Chinese
could be mobilized into an economic force. The Japanese, Portuguese,
Russians and British found little wealth in China. The British, who had
found so much to exploit in India, contented themselves with peddling
opium to the Chinese.
The first indications that there might be enormous potential in China
can be retrospectively seen in the role of the Chinese community in the
economic miracle of Singapore, followed by the explosion of Hong Kong. A
sleepy British colony became an economic powerhouse. If little Hong Kong
could do that, what would happen in the mainland? The answer is that the
world is flooded with Chinese manufacturers.
Next year, Chinese automobiles will hit the United States and western
Europe. Soon China will lag only in large commercial aircraft – and that
cannot be forever. Yet no economic power is invincible: They rise and
they fall.
On Capitol Hill, lawmakers have found a villain: the pegging of the
Chinese currency to the dollar. If it were allowed to float, they argue,
Chinese imports would go up in price and there would be some equilibrium
in world trade. Yet The Economist magazine has calculated that
trading freely the yuan would rise only a few percentage points. The
magazine’s purchasing power index has indicated that the yuan is not
terribly undervalued.
The trouble is that the Chinese are very good at beating us at our own
game. In Trenton, N.J., there is a large sign that can be read from
passing trains. It says, "What Trenton makes, the world takes."
Unfortunately, that is no longer true. What Beijing makes, the world
takes – and Beijing makes more and more.
Universal protectionism may not be the answer. American children do not
want to do without toys, sushi bars without fish or, for that matter,
women without bras. A few years ago the European trade commissioner,
Britain’s Peter Mandelson, moved against the importation of bras from
China. Unfortunately, he did not do his homework and had not learned
that bra manufacturing was in such poor repair in Europe that women
needed their uplift from China.
It has become a cliché to say that China is the world’s factory. Like
many clichés, it is true.
© 2007 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # LK003.
Request permission to publish here. |