Herman
Cain
Read Herman's bio and previous columns
November 19, 2007
Stop Measuring Those
Drapes, Hillary
If you listen to the tone of the liberal media establishments and the
die-hard Democrats, Sen. Hillary Clinton should order her drapes for the
Oval Office. Not so fast! There are some compelling opportunities for
Republicans to turn her dream into a nightmare.
First, as the Democratic pollsters and the media tout her commanding
lead over her nearest Democratic rival, Sen. Barack Obama, they
conveniently fail to emphasize her consistently high negatives versus
her positive perceptions. The margin of her consistently high negatives
versus her positives is much greater than that of any other candidate.
Translation: People really love her despite the shallowness many of us
see, or they really, really hate the idea of her being president for a
lot of reasons.
One of the big reasons for not favoring Hillary is her lack of real
leadership experience. She often alludes to her experience as the wife
of a previous president, Bill Clinton. That certainly is not the same as
leading a state, a city, a business or any organization that has
multi-disciplinary functions.
Hillary also likes to refer to her time and experience in the Senate.
Senators are supposed to develop good national policy, and influence
others to support passage of good national policy. Maybe it’s me, but I
am drawing a blank on that front. And if one honestly considers the
ideas she has proposed and then sometimes un-proposed or flip-flopped on
since starting her presidential campaign, the serious voter is still
asking “Where’s the beef?”
The consistently high negatives mean that it is unlikely Hillary will
win those voters over, and that the conservative-thinking,
middle-of-the-road voters will not join her merry band of blind
followers.
Secondly, Hillary and her Democratic rivals are consistently socialist
in their ideas and ideology. They say it differently, but it always
comes down to bigger government and more government mandates on
individuals and businesses – and always paying for those ideas with more
taxes on the ever-elusive “rich”.
Thirdly, even though the previous Republican-controlled Congress fumbled
the ball on spending, personal retirement accounts and immigration
reform, the Democratic-controlled Congress has managed to achieve the
lowest congressional approval rating in modern history. Maybe the
Democrats have not figured out that their strategy of doom-and-gloom
political posturing and “wrong direction” policy proclamations are not
enough to fool enough of the people all of the time.
The good news for the Republicans is that more and more people are
seeing through the Democratic veil of pandering, while offering no real
solutions for the biggest problems we face. More and more people are
connecting with the enduring advantages of a society with more liberties
and more economic freedoms instead of a society controlled by a few
power-inspired politicians.
The other good news for the Republicans is the consistency of the
Republican presidential candidates on the major issues that matter the
most. Namely, enhancing our national security by vigorously fighting
Islamic fascism, allowing free-market principles to continue to drive
our economic superiority in the world, sustaining a vibrant economy by
not raising taxes and cutting government spending, and encouraging
self-responsibility by giving people a helping hand instead of handouts.
The Republican presidential candidates may all say it differently, but
it comes down to a better future for this country based on its founding
principles.
But hope for the Republicans running for president or Congress in 2008
has to be cultivated with clear-targeted messages of what can be,
instead of “this is how bad it is”. There is more opportunity for the
Republicans than the pundits can measure or predict in 2008, but
Republicans have to go out and get it with message-focused campaigns
instead of party-focused campaigns.
There is still much hope that, come 2009, there will be red drapes
rather than blue drapes in the Oval Office.
© 2007 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # HC087.
Request
permission to publish here.
|